{"id":14689,"date":"2014-07-11T14:50:10","date_gmt":"2014-07-11T12:50:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/praag.org\/?p=14689"},"modified":"2014-07-11T14:50:31","modified_gmt":"2014-07-11T12:50:31","slug":"get-diverse-or-else-british-govt-tells-filmmakers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/praag.org\/?p=14689","title":{"rendered":"Get &#8216;diverse&#8217; or else, British govt tells filmmakers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Movie companies have been told they must meet new targets for ethnic minority, gay and female characters on screen to be eligible for future funding from the British Film Institute.<\/p>\n<p>The BFI, Britain\u2019s largest public film fund, announced a \u201cThree Ticks\u201d scheme to ensure diversity in films and behind the scenes as it set out new rules for funding.<\/p>\n<p>Under the system, to be implemented in September, films must \u201ctick\u201d at least two of three criteria: on-screen diversity; off-screen diversity and \u201ccreating opportunities and social mobility\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The BFI, which allocates lottery funding and invests more than \u00a327\u2009million in film production, sales and distribution, supports about 30 new projects a year. It backed The King\u2019s Speech and Philomena.<\/p>\n<p>The new rules will compel filmmakers to place \u201cdiverse\u201d actors and subjects at the forefront of their projects, as well as ensuring minority workers are represented on set and in the crew.<\/p>\n<p>On screen, at least one lead character must be \u201cpositively reflecting diversity\u201d, with the story more likely to receive funding if it \u201cexplicitly and predominantly explores issues of identity relating to ethnicity or national origins, a specific focus on women, people with disabilities, sexual identity, age and people from a socially disadvantaged background\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Among the films the BFI has praised for content include Suffragette, the story of the battle for women to gain the vote, and Pride, about gay activists supporting the miners\u2019 strike. It will ask filmmakers to ensure that at least 30 per cent of supporting and non-speaking characters are also \u201cdiverse\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Off-screen, at least two heads of department must be from diverse backgrounds, as well as a range of \u201ckey creatives\u201d including the director, screenwriter, composer and cinematographer.<\/p>\n<p>The third category requires companies to offer paid internships and jobs to \u201cnew entrants from diverse backgrounds\u201d and to help them progress.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThree Ticks\u201d is likely to raise fears about compromising scripts\u2019 authenticity, with period dramas less likely to naturally represent \u201cdiverse backgrounds\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>A spokesman for the BFI insisted all films would have the opportunity to meet the criteria, with even those not fulfilling them onscreen able to \u201ctick\u201d the other two sections.<\/p>\n<p>Ed Vaizey, the culture minister, praised the initiative as helping to \u201craise the bar\u201d, adding that he would like to see all television, film and performing arts companies following the BFI\u2019s example.<\/p>\n<p>Amanda Nevill, the CEO of the BFI, said it was \u201cvital\u201d to reflect British society in order to stay relevant and said the announcement \u201cis just the beginning\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Last month, the BBC announced it would ensure one in seven actors and presenters will be either black, Asian or ethnic minority in the next three years.<\/p>\n<p>At the time, critics including Philip Davies, the Conservative MP, called it \u201cabsolutely ridiculous\u201d political correctness, saying that all recruitment \u201cshould be done on ability\u201d. &#8211; Daily Telegraph<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On screen, at least one lead character must be &#8216;positively reflecting diversity&#8217;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49,3],"tags":[186,9466,1553,9465,9464,3039,9463,747],"class_list":["post-14689","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-europe","category-news","tag-britain","tag-british-film-institute","tag-diversity","tag-ethnick","tag-films","tag-gay","tag-movies","tag-women"],"cc_featured_image_caption":{"caption_text":false,"source_text":false,"source_url":false},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14689","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14689"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14689\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14690,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14689\/revisions\/14690"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14689"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14689"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14689"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}