{"id":16857,"date":"2014-11-12T16:00:06","date_gmt":"2014-11-12T14:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/praag.org\/?p=16857"},"modified":"2014-11-12T16:00:06","modified_gmt":"2014-11-12T14:00:06","slug":"apartheid-for-emoji-characters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/praag.org\/?p=16857","title":{"rendered":"Apartheid for emoji characters"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A new proposal drafted by the Unicode Consortium would introduce more &#8220;racial diversity&#8221;, apartheid actually, into the popular emoji characters used in messages on smartphones.<\/p>\n<p>The proposal, edited by Google&#8217;s Mark Davis and Apple&#8217;s Peter Edberg, would bring skin tones, based on the Fitzpatrick scale for dermatology, to emoji characters in five hues ranging from a pale creme to a dark brown.<\/p>\n<p>To use the new emoji, users would select the emoji person or character and then add a tone. On compatible phones, a single emoji image or glyph would be show up.<\/p>\n<p>On phones that do not support the new font, users will likely see a standard emoji glyph and then a color swatch next to it indicating the skin tone.<\/p>\n<p>The skin tone modifiers would work on all people-related characters, including those that depict couples. A possibility for emoji with couples would be to enter in the skin tone value for each person separately.<\/p>\n<p>Right now, the proposal is still a draft and there is no timeline for implementation so we don&#8217;t know when it will reach your phones.<\/p>\n<p>Source: TechCrunch<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A new proposal drafted by the Unicode Consortium would introduce more &#8220;racial diversity&#8221;, apartheid actually, into the popular emoji characters used in messages on smartphones. The proposal, edited by Google&#8217;s Mark Davis and Apple&#8217;s Peter Edberg, would bring skin tones, based on the Fitzpatrick scale for dermatology, to emoji characters in five hues ranging from &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/praag.org\/?p=16857\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Apartheid for emoji characters&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2961,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[4938,164,1203,10532,10533,2130,1761],"class_list":["post-16857","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-android","tag-apartheid","tag-apple","tag-emoji","tag-emoticons","tag-google","tag-racial-differences"],"cc_featured_image_caption":{"caption_text":false,"source_text":false,"source_url":false},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16857","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2961"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16857"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16857\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16858,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16857\/revisions\/16858"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16857"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16857"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16857"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}