{"id":2707,"date":"2012-10-09T09:25:49","date_gmt":"2012-10-09T09:25:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/praag.org\/?p=2707"},"modified":"2012-10-09T09:28:35","modified_gmt":"2012-10-09T09:28:35","slug":"we-dont-need-a-race-box","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/praag.org\/?p=2707","title":{"rendered":"‘We don’t need a race box’"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\"\"<\/a><\/dt>\n
Abigail Fisher<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/div>\n

Abigail Fisher is a slight young woman with strawberry blond hair, a smile that needs little prompting, a determined manner and a good academic record. She played soccer in high school, and she is an accomplished cellist.<\/p>\n

But the university she had her heart set on, the one her father and sister had attended, rejected her. \u201cI was devastated,\u201d she said, in her first news interview since she was turned down by the University of Texas at Austin<\/a> four years ago.<\/p>\n

Ms. Fisher, 22, who is white and recently graduated from Louisiana State University, says that her race was held against her, and the Supreme Court<\/a> is to hear her case on Wednesday, bringing new attention to the combustible issue of the constitutionality of racial preferences in admissions decisions by public universities.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m hoping,\u201d she said, \u201cthat they\u2019ll completely take race out of the issue in terms of admissions and that everyone will be able to get into any school that they want no matter what race they are but solely based on their merit and if they work hard for it.\u201d<\/p>\n

The university said Ms. Fisher would not have been admitted even if race had played no role in the process, and it questioned whether she has suffered the sort of injury that gives her standing to sue. But the university\u2019s larger defense is that it must be free to assemble a varied student body as part of its academic and societal mission. The Supreme Court endorsed that view by a 5-to-4 vote in 2003 in Grutter v. Bollinger<\/a>.<\/p>\n

University officials said that the school\u2019s affirmative action program was needed to build a student body diverse enough to include minority students with a broad range of backgrounds and for the campus to have a \u201ccritical mass\u201d of minority students in most classrooms. Interaction among students in class and around campus, said Kedra Ishop, the university\u2019s director of admissions, helps students overcome biases and make contributions to a diverse society. \u201cThe role of U.T. Austin,\u201d Dr. Ishop said, \u201cis to provide leadership to the state.\u201d<\/p>\n

The majority opinion in the Grutter case, written by Justice Sandra Day O\u2019Connor, rejected the use of racial quotas in admissions decisions but said that race could be used as one factor among many, as part of a \u201cholistic review.\u201d Justice O\u2019Connor retired in 2006, and her replacement by Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. may open the way for a ruling cutting back on such race-conscious admissions policies, or eliminating them.<\/p>\n

The Constitution does not permit the government to sort people by race, no matter how worthy its goal. \u201cWhile racial diversity on college campuses is beneficial, it cannot be attained by racial discrimination,\u201d said Edward Blum, an adviser to Ms. Fisher and a driving force behind the Fisher case.<\/p>\n

Three-quarters of applicants from Texas are admitted under a program that guarantees admission to the top students in every high school in the state. The remaining Texas students and those from elsewhere are considered under standards that take account of academic achievement and other factors, including race and ethnicity.<\/p>\n

In the fall of last year, freshmen who enrolled under the program were 26 percent Hispanic and 6 percent black. Texas is 38 percent Hispanic and 12 percent black.<\/p>\n

The university said<\/a> the Top Ten program was a blunt instrument and that classes in many subjects have few or no minority students. It adds that the diversity generated by the Top Ten program is \u201cmostly a product of the fact that Texas high schools remain highly segregated in regions of the state,\u201d which \u201climits the diversity that can be achieved within<\/em> racial groups.\u201d<\/p>\n

Among the kind of student excluded by the Top Ten program, the university said is \u201cthe African-American or Hispanic child of successful professionals in Dallas who has strong SAT scores and has demonstrated leadership ability in extracurricular activities but falls in the second decile of his or her high school class (or attends an elite private school that does not rank).\u201d<\/p>\n

Ms. Fisher\u2019s lawyers called that<\/a> \u201ca newly minted interest in elitism dressed up as \u2018intra-racial\u2019 diversity.\u201d They added that the university is making the unseemly pitch for \u201cits preferred kind of minorities\u201d at the expense of white students like Ms. Fisher with similar qualifications.<\/p>\n

Talking in the hallway after the seminar, Joao Eloy, who was admitted outside the Top Ten program, said he had mixed feelings about the university\u2019s approach. \u201cMy only concern is if diversity becomes a priority above merit,\u201d he said, adding that he was wary of any system that \u201cpunishes Asians and poor whites, to name a few.\u201d<\/p>\n

Nosa Aimuyo, whose parents are Nigerian immigrants and who was also admitted outside the Top Ten program, said race-conscious admissions were needed to address \u201cdisparities in opportunity between high schools, which disproportionately affect minorities.\u201d<\/p>\n

In an interview in his office in Austin, William C. Powers Jr, the university\u2019s president, said the attributes that the university seeks have many dimensions. \u201cWe want diversity in terms of economic background, first generation, geography, inner city, suburban middle class,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Asked what he would say to Ms. Fisher, whose own background is middle class, about her disappointment at being rejected, Mr. Powers paused for a moment.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe look at everyone\u2019s holistic characteristics,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Last month, Ms. Fisher spent a morning chatting with a reporter at a private club in Washington and then took an impromptu tour of the Supreme Court, where the grandeur of the surroundings seemed to bring home to her the gravity of the question she had presented to the justices.<\/p>\n

She is working in Austin, where she had wanted to be in the first place, as a financial analyst. She said her college years at Louisiana State had been fine and that she had enjoyed the camaraderie of the bowling team.<\/p>\n

But she added that she had lost a benefit that her state\u2019s government had decided to distribute on a basis other than merit.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe only thing I missed out on was my post-graduation years,\u201d she said. \u201cJust being in a network of U.T. graduates would have been a really nice thing to be in. And I probably would have gotten a better job offer had I gone to U.T.\u201d She said she was trying to come to terms with her role in a case that could reshape American higher education. Asked if she found it interesting or exciting or scary, she said, \u201cAll of the above.\u201d<\/p>\n

But she did not hesitate to say how she would run an admission system. \u201cI don\u2019t think,\u201d she said, \u201cthat we even need to have a race box on the application.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Abigail Fisher Abigail Fisher is a slight young woman with strawberry blond hair, a smile that needs little prompting, a determined manner and a good academic record. She played soccer in high school, and she is an accomplished cellist. But the university she had her heart set on, the one her father and sister had … Continue reading “‘We don’t need a race box’”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2708,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[1282,356,806,745,1717,1718],"class_list":["post-2707","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","category-united-states","tag-abigail-fisher","tag-affirmative-action","tag-racial-preferences","tag-usa","tag-ut","tag-white-students"],"cc_featured_image_caption":{"caption_text":false,"source_text":false,"source_url":false},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/praag.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/fischer.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2707","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2707"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2707\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2710,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2707\/revisions\/2710"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2708"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2707"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2707"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2707"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}