{"id":6351,"date":"2013-06-28T16:37:00","date_gmt":"2013-06-28T16:37:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/praag.org\/?p=6351"},"modified":"2013-06-28T16:37:00","modified_gmt":"2013-06-28T16:37:00","slug":"zombie-democracy-or-crass-majoritarianism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/praag.org\/?p=6351","title":{"rendered":"Zombie democracy, or crass majoritarianism"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_6356\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-6356\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"http:\/\/praag.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/voting_south_africa.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-6356\" alt=\"Voting in South Africa\" src=\"http:\/\/praag.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/voting_south_africa-300x213.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"213\" srcset=\"https:\/\/praag.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/voting_south_africa-300x213.jpg 300w, https:\/\/praag.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/voting_south_africa.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 85vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-6356\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Voting in South Africa<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>This opinion piece from the British Economist deals with the &#8216;zombie democracy&#8217; of Turkey, but it might as well have been written about South Africa since 1994 where huge majorities entitle rulers to trample upon the basic rights of minorities, such as whites and Afrikaners.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cBUT I\u2019ve won three elections!\u201d Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey\u2019s embattled prime minister, growls at his critics. On the face of it, his case is compelling: surely, many people in Turkey and beyond would agree, popularly elected leaders can govern as they please? That\u2019s what democracy means.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Well, no. Majoritarianism\u2014the credo of an expanding group of elected but autocratic rulers around the world, which holds that electoral might always makes you right\u2014is not true democracy, even if, on the face of it, the two things look alike. It is worth explaining why.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">To begin with, democratic legitimacy isn\u2019t merely a correlative of a ruler\u2019s share of the vote. Few candidates in the West nowadays win more than half of the votes, still less a majority of the electorate. Most are obliged to govern with slim electoral mandates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If broad support does not automatically qualify a leader as a democrat, nor does strong opposition disqualify him. Margaret Thatcher\u2019s reforms were contentious, to say the least. The heat and vitriol of politics have intensified in the Fox News, shock-jock, bile-blogging era: Barack Obama is often lambasted as tyrannical or traitorous. Tough decisions, such as spending cuts or tax rises, can provoke widespread anger, as the past few years have demonstrated. Bold reforms, which <em>The Economist <\/em>applauds, often do the same. That doesn\u2019t make the leaders who impose them undemocratic, either.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The issue is how the relationship between supporters and opponents is managed. In part this is a matter of rules and institutions to constrain a leader\u2019s power and to allow the aggrieved to find redress. These should include a robust account of citizens\u2019 basic rights, independent courts to enforce them and free media to monitor them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Beyond documents and institutions, the difference between crass majoritarianism and democracy resides in the heads of the mighty. Democrats have a bedrock understanding that the minority (or often majority) who did not vote for them are as much citizens of their country as those who did, and are entitled to a respectful hearing; and that a leader\u2019s job is to deliberate and act in the national interests, not just those of his supporters. Turkey\u2019s protesters took to the streets because they believed Mr Erdogan was not just hostile to their interests but deaf to their complaints. By demonising them as terrorists and foreign agents, and pulverising them with tear gas and water cannon, he has vindicated this belief. The contrast with Brazil, where Dilma Rousseff has insisted that demonstrators have a right to protest, is striking.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\">Heartless<\/h4>\n<p>The basic idea of a democracy is that the voters should pick a government, which rules as it chooses until they see fit to chuck it out. But although voting is an important democratic right, it is not the only one. And winning an election does not entitle a leader to disregard all checks on his power. The majoritarian world view espoused by Mr Erdogan and leaders of his ilk is a kind of zombie democracy. It has the outward shape of the real thing, but it lacks the heart.<\/p>\n<p>Read the whole article in <a title=\"Zombie democracy\" href=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/news\/leaders\/21579850-note-turkeys-prime-minister-among-others-winning-elections-not-enough-zombie-democracy?spc=scode&amp;spv=xm&amp;ah=9d7f7ab945510a56fa6d37c30b6f1709\" target=\"_blank\">The Economist<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This opinion piece from the British Economist deals with the &#8216;zombie democracy&#8217; of Turkey, but it might as well have been written about South Africa since 1994 where huge majorities entitle rulers to trample upon the basic rights of minorities, such as whites and Afrikaners. \u201cBUT I\u2019ve won three elections!\u201d Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey\u2019s embattled &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/praag.org\/?p=6351\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Zombie democracy, or crass majoritarianism&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6356,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[492],"tags":[930,3565,3563,3564,1632,3562],"class_list":["post-6351","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-opinion","tag-democracy","tag-erdogan","tag-majoritarianism","tag-the-economist","tag-turkey","tag-zombie-democracy"],"cc_featured_image_caption":{"caption_text":false,"source_text":false,"source_url":false},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/praag.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/voting_south_africa.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6351","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6351"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6351\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6358,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6351\/revisions\/6358"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/6356"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6351"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6351"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praag.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6351"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}