SA’s contaminated water poses danger to agriculture

riversSouth African river water is highly contaminated with a cocktail of bacteria. This water is used to irrigate agricultural produce all over the country and, if eaten raw, the contaminated food reaches and can cause illness in consumers.

This was said on Monday by Trevor Britz, professor in food science at Stellenbosch University at a congress being held by the SA Association for Food Science and Technology at the CSIR in Pretoria.

Britz is a scientist with a DSc from Pretoria University, specialising in environmental bacteriology. With colleague C Lamprecht, he has for four years headed a team conducting a study funded by the Water Research Commission and the Department of Agriculture on the use of river water for irrigation in agriculture.

The results have shown unequivocally that the microbial levels of rivers and fresh produce monitored in South Africa are unacceptably high.

Britz told the congress that consumption of fresh produce was increasing worldwide and, since often eaten raw, it made an excellent vehicle for disease transmission. Not surprisingly, food-borne disease outbreaks linked to fresh produce are increasing in number and intensity.

Although fresh produce can become contaminated at any time in the agri-food chain, pre-harvest contamination is considered the most likely origin. One important source of pathogens found on fresh produce is from faecally-contaminated irrigation water. Over the past decade the microbial quality of many local rivers used for irrigation of fresh produce has decreased and pollution levels are far above recommended World Health Organisation and local guidelines.

In some rivers faecal indicators reached “log 7” cell concentrations. In many cases the rivers did not meet the international faecal guideline for safe irrigation with Escherichia coli concentrations exceeding 1 000 colony-forming unit (cfu) per 100 ml-1.

The presence of indicator organisms indicated unsanitary conditions, as well as the presence of potential pathogens including staphylococcus, klebsiella, listeria, salmonella, enterococcus, coliforms, E coli, norovirus and hepatitis-A viruses, and protozoa.

It was concluded that there was a high risk of exposure to human pathogens when water from these rivers is used to irrigate produce that is consumed raw.

In view of this, as well as the seriousness of recent E coli food-borne outbreaks which involved multi-drug resistant pathogenic E coli strains, it could be argued that the potential of E coli as an emerging pathogen on fresh produce poses a serious risk.

In his lecture Britz said informal settlements and industrial pollution were the main sources of river contamination. “Our findings are extremely unpopular with both central and provincial governments and municipalities.”

Intervention was required to reduce the health risks but concerns were dismissed, for instance by saying the E coli contamination was reduced by the rivers. This was found to be untrue as the contamination was often just as bad downstream.

Education of the public was paramount in terms of hygiene, like washing hands and food, he said.

From the authorities, better sewerage infrastructure was urgently required. Many settlements had sewerage and water, but the capacity was too low to handle the load.

Unless something was done, the risk would increase, he said. – Pretoria News

African invader could threaten food, jobs

Africa Cup of Nations visitors could introduce an unwanted and potentially economically crippling visitor – the African invader fly.

Issuing an urgent alert, the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries yesterday announced steps it was taking to ensure visitors would not bring in any unwanted food or animal products that could be contaminated with the fly.

The fly – which has caused millions of rands worth of damage to the economies of South Africa’s neighbours – has already been detected in Limpopo, threatening food security.

Mpho Sekgala, the department’ s assistant director for plant health promotion , said: “Our appeal is not to bring any foreign food products, especially fruit.”

Jan Hendrik Venter, the department’s early warning systems manager, said Afcon posed a serious threat to the spread of the fly.

“It is imperative travellers do not travel with fruit from infected areas. One infected mango can contain 30 fly larvae and if this spreads we have serious problems.”

It is the third time since 2010 that the fly – whose larvae destroy fruit and vegetables – has been detected in Limpopo. In Botswana, it has caused more than R11-million damage on fruit farms.

“Our eradication programmes in the past have been successful. Eradication processes are under way in Limpopo,” Sekgala said.

Although it had been detected, it had yet to reach infestation phase.

“Our biggest concern is the spread of this fly and the threat to Mpumalanga and North West.

“All of our neighbouring countries have reported the fly’s occurrence … which is of major concern,” Sekgala said. Once infected, fruit had to be destroyed.

“The biggest challenge is the movement of infected fruit and education of hawkers and subsistence farmers.

“While infected areas have been quarantined, there is a danger of the fly spreading through vendors selling fruit to motorists.”

If the infestation is not curbed, it could have detrimental effects, especially to the economy.

Venter said: “We have established containment areas and are eradicating the insect through organic pesticides and specialised bait traps in villages, orchards and production zones.

“The financial loss is on multiple fronts. It can cause large production loss for small-scale farmers, threatening food security, and can lead to international trade bans.

“Trade restrictions could see market loss and difficulty in accessing new markets.

“The direct financial impact is in terms of production losses, while the indirect impact is market losses. Studies show that a 10% production loss can lead to the potential loss of 75000 jobs.” timeslive.co.za