‘H. Naledi an animal on the cusp of transition’

The spotlight in human evolution had long since shifted to the Great Rift Valley of East Africa.

Lee Berger, the American paleoanthropologist got a job at the University of the Witwatersrand, Wits, to hunt for fossils in the 1990s, but Berger has almost alone in arguing that South Africa was the place to look for the true earliest Homo.

Berger’s finds and theories in 2008 were dismissed by most scientists.

It was announced on Thursday in the journal eLife that a new species of human ancestor was found deep in a South African cave, perhaps adding a baffling new branch to the family tree.

Homo naledi, as they call it, appears very primitive in some respects—it had a tiny brain, for instance, and apelike shoulders for climbing.

“The message we’re getting is of an animal right on the cusp of the transition from Australopithecus to Homo,” Berger said. “Everything that is touching the world in a critical way is like us. The other parts retain bits of their primitive past.”

The fossil record is frustratingly ambiguous. Slightly older than H. erectus is a species called Homo habilis, or “handy man”—so named by Louis Leakey and his colleagues in 1964 because they believed it responsible for the stone tools they were finding at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania.

In the 1970s teams led by Louis’s son Richard found more H. habilis specimens in Kenya, and ever since, the species has provided a shaky base for the human family tree, keeping it rooted in East Africa.

Before H. habilis the human story goes dark, with just a few fossil fragments of Homo too sketchy to warrant a species name.

As one scientist put it, they would easily fit in a shoe box, and you’d still have room for the shoes.

A South African chartered accountant who was exploring the Rising Star cave for fun stumbled onto the bones by chance.

They took photographs, and then decided to head to Professor Berger’s house to show him the pictures.

Because funding came from National Geographic (Berger is also a National Geographic explorer-in-residence), they now claim the find.

Berger gathered some 60 scientists and set up an aboveground command center, a science tent, and a small village of sleeping and support tents.

Marina Elliott, then a graduate student at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, was the first scientist down the chute.

Mapping the world: Crimea is Russian

Mapping the world as it is
Mapping the world as it is

“We map the world as it is – not as people would like it to be,” National Geographic’s map-making authority says, as the educational entertainment giant prepares to mark Crimea as part of Russia after the parliament officially ratifies the measure.

Juan Jose Valdes, NatGeo’s geographer, chief editor and research director for the map-making division, emerged from a meeting with the magazine’s editorial, legal and cartographic authorities on Tuesday, where the decision was made to give the area a temporary special shading (like the Gaza Strip or the West Bank), until permanent coloring after the Russian parliament approves the treaty signed by President Putin and the Crimean authorities.

When the parliamentary vote takes place later in the week, “the document will be revised to indicate that the change has officially occurred and Crimea is officially part of Russia, then we will identify Crimea with the Russian boundary tint,” Valdes told the U.S. News.

“As you can only surmise, sometimes our maps are not received in a positive light by some individuals who want to see the world in a different light,” the director explained, which is not the case with other map makers. Rand McNally, another leader in atlas and map production, will not be making any changes to its maps.

The company spokesperson, Amy Krouse said “we take our direction from the State Department.”

Google has continued to show Crimea as part of Ukraine.

Source: RT