Game lodges draw international paedophile tourists

lodges2A man that is alleged to have worked as a manager at various game lodges across the country, including the Lowveld, is also being charged with the possession of child pornography.

The suspect (59) allegedly “pimped” children to visiting guests before he was apprehended by Brighton Beach SAP in KwaZulu-Natal on May 27. His arrest was thanks to information received from a neighbour with whom he shared a wireless internet connection (Wifi).

National police spokesman Lt Gen Solomon Makgale confirmed the case was not linked to the national and international child pornography investigation which implicated a local primary school principal and is alleged to have 50 more suspects.

According to the police, the neighbour was perusing through the shared documents folder when she came across the pornographic images. She took screen shots and presented them to the police, which subsequently led to his arrest. – looklocal.co.za

The man’s computer equipment was seized, pending further investigation. Police believe the total number of images stored on his computer runs into hundreds of thousands.

According to a social worker who cannot be identified, the man was alleged to have taken a boy away from his mother when he was eight years old and pretended to be his father.

The boy is now 21 years old. The social worker said the police have alleged that he abused and used the child as bait for other children to be sexually abused. He allegedly also filmed the children. They were reportedly also “hired” by guests who stayed at the lodges he worked at.

The source said the lodges or game farms had not yet been identified but the background in the pornographic pictures did allegedly show some had been taken in the Lowveld indigenous area.

The suspect is out on bail of R5 000 on the condition that he did not contact state witnesses.

The case has been postponed to December 6, pending the outcome of the forensic report. The accused has not been asked to plead, which is why he may not be identified as yet.

 

‘Poverty and inequality is the real porn’

ofgoodreport2While discussing the banned movie Of Good Report, International Film Festival manager Peter Machen broke down in tears at a Film and Publication Board workshop in Durban, on Wednesday.

“This is something that breaks my heart. The real pornography in our society is poverty and inequality,” said Machen, responding to a statement by the board saying the film was child pornography.

“I really care about this country and I live among so many people who are so f***ed up and nothing is being done to help them and all we can do is care about this,” he said.

Machen then apologised and left to loud applause from the audience, returning a few minutes later.

Of Good Report was scheduled to open the festival, but was refused classification after a scene depicting a teacher engaging in oral sex with his Grade 9 pupil caused the classifying panel to red-flag the film.

The board held the workshop to inform film-makers about how it classifies films, and touched on the issue of child pornography and Of Good Report.

Board spokesman Prince Mlimandlela Ndamase said the board supported the message which the film “attempts to make”.

But its guidelines indicated child pornography was regarded as being any picture of a real or imaginary person under 18, or represented as being under the age of 18, engaged in any form of sexual activity.

The board’s acting chief operations officer, Sipho Risiba, said their classification guidelines were online with the Film and Publications Act.

“Now that the subject is a matter of appeal, we will continue to follow the letter of the law,” said Risiba.

Machen filed an appeal on the decision to not classify the film. The appeals hearing was scheduled to take place this weekend.

Ndamase said the appeals board, chaired by acting High Court Judge Karthy Govender, would, hopefully, announce its decision next week.

Of Good Report’s producer, Michael Auret, said the film had to be viewed in context and artistic merit considered.

“What they are saying is incorrect. Case law specifically says they have to determine whether the film is primarily designed to arouse people or is designed to do something else,” said Auret. “We will have to go back to the Constitutional Court to amend the law.” – The Mercury