President Barack Obama says he is “absolutely certain” that the Senate’s comprehensive immigration bill would pass the House if majority Republicans brought it up for a vote. But Republicans say they’ll bring up a series of narrow bills instead.
Speaking Friday at the White House, Obama said he would like to see the House act on the Senate bill in September, as soon as they return from summer recess. He urged the House to put forward a bill that could pass, even if does not match the Senate bill. The versions could be reconciled later. Obama says no bill would solve the nation’s immigration problem 100 percent.
The Senate-passed bill would include billions for border security and a path to citizenship for 11 million immigrants in the country illegally. – Breitbart
This is nonsense on stilts—true only if an expansion in the size and power of the federal government is a net positive.
If you’ve enjoyed the “work” of Department of Homeland Security Director Janet Napolitano, you’ll love her successor (rumored to be the New York Police Department’s stop-and-frisk Ray Kelly). The Marco Rubio immigration Bill concentrates even more power in the office Kelly might inherit. Such power includes the ability to adjust the status of a “registered provisional immigrant” (RPI) to that of “an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence,” on satisfying a few ridiculous conditions, one of which is the RPI’s “continuous physical presence.” In other words, for being in the country illegally, the RPI may get his illegal status reversed at the pleasure of the secretary.
Is this not Kafkaesque? It is for any American who imagines that government ought to, at the very least, stand sentinel against unsolicited and unjustified trespass.
Almost all powers specified in the Bill are the prerogative of the Secretary of DOHS, although DOJ will get a chance to bolster its banana-republic credentials. Eric Holder’s Department of Justice gets bigger and badder under the Gang of Eight’s plot to reel-in more “undocumented Democrats.”
For instance, were an employer to hire, fire or verify an RPI’s employment eligibility in a manner that might be construed as a discriminating “immigration-related employment practice,” the proprietor is in hot water. In defending their rights of private property, “foreign labor contractors” will be, moreover, going up against tax-paid litigators, to whom the amnestied will have access.
You’d think that an expansion of the frivolous and counter-intuitive grounds upon which private-property owners may be prosecuted goes against libertarian sensibilities.
Another burden business will bear is the harvesting of data for the government. On exiting the country, departing globe-trotting RPIs will have their biometrical data collected and stored. The onus will be on the country’s carriers to do the job. The airlines will be compelled to help government track these departing Democrats.
Open-border libertarians must also like the idea of helping Barack Obama to keep the student-loan bubble afloat. Trust Sen. Chuck Schumer’s immigration bill to make it much harder to deny an “unlawful alien’s eligibility for higher education benefits.”
The monk-like devotion of the “small government” types at the Wall Street Journal and the Independent Institute to government growth mandated by John McCain’s Bill is no minor flaw. For example, the “Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013″ establishes in the Treasury the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Trust Fund.” As well as a “Department of Homeland Security Border Oversight Task Force.” Not to mention an “Ombudsman for Immigration Related Concerns.” As does the Bill authorize the appointment of many additional magistrate judges and district judges.
More litigators mean fewer rights for locals; more state functionaries spells additional pensions and unaffordable promises in perpetuity.
Yes, these privileges and perks are carved out of the hides of taxpaying Americans, immigrants included.
Did I mention that the same taxpayers will be liberated of funds which will go to nonprofit organizations that assist registered provisional immigrant applicants? Ask Gangster Jeff Flake, a Republican supporter—although he, like the other sorts aforementioned, all claiming to stand sentinel against state incursion, has likely not read the Bill.
Needless to say, S.744 galvanizes armies of child and family protective civil servants so as to ensure that in the stampede for stuff, no feelings are hurt and no faux rights trampled.
Free-for-all fools are right about one thing. Americans who worry incessantly about the status of the Northern Mariana Islands can relax. The islanders’ representatives in the US Senate have decided that, with respect to immigration, the Northern Mariana Islands are part of the commonwealth. This no doubt is a giant leap for proponents of the night-watchman, minimal state (NOT).
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.