Mining and land rights discussed at PAP

Constitution Hill
Constitution Hill

Mining activity and the land issue is to be discussed in the Pan African Parliament.

Co-hosted by Oxfam, Action Aid, the Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS), and the Future Agricultures Consortium, the hearings offer people affected by land dispossession an opportunity to share their experiences with a panel linked to the Pan African Parliament.

The land question came up at a two-day hearing at Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, during the continent’s first ever land grab rights hearings on Thursday and Friday.

The villagers claim that the land that they share with a platinum mining company has been degraded by the contamination of its underground water.

The mining company has a long lease on the land.

“Our old people were manipulated into believing that mining would be beneficial to them,” Brand Nthapo said. “But the contaminated water has taken that away.”

Devastation is the recurring theme of the stories told by many villagers in the platinum belt of Limpopo.

“A cloud of devastation looms over the heads of people in Mapela [in the Mokopane area].”

Nthapo said that when mining in Mokopane started 20 years ago traditional leaders would lease the land out for R5000 a year. This, he said, had now been raised to R15000 a year.

The story of the Mokopane people was one of nine told during the hearings at Constitution Hill.

Raulina Valoyi, of Mozambique, said she and other villagers felt betrayed by the company that took their land.

“We gave them a portion of the land but they went beyond that and took even the land we used for produce.

“Now we do not have enough land for crops,” she said.

Panel chairman and director of the African Institute for Economic Development Olokushi Adebayo said the hearings gave an insight into how land grabs affected people’s daily lives.

“What is both sad and annoying is that we seem to be allowing history to repeat itself. Colonialism was directly linked to land grabs disguised as partnerships.”

Adebayo and his six co-panellists, and representatives of villagers affected by land transfers, agreed that they would call on all organisations and administrations dealing with land dispossession to audit land use to determine who were the true beneficiaries.

Adebayo said the solution to making Africa’s food resources secure lay not in large-scale commercial farming but in small-scale farming.

“We will be meeting at the Pan African Parliament where the findings from the studies we have conducted will be presented.” – timeslive.co.za

Zuma proposes new land reform plan

President Jacob Zuma proposed a new land reform plan in Pretoria on Monday evening.

“This is an innovative proposal that needs to be tested,” he told the first annual general meeting of the African Farmers’ Association of SA (Afasa).

The plan proposed a district-based approach to land reform and its financing.

“It proposes that each district should establish a district land reform committee where all stakeholders are involved,” Zuma said.

“This committee will be responsible for identifying 20% of the commercial agricultural land in the district and giving commercial farmers the option of assisting its transfer to black farmers.”

Implementation of this land reform proposal would include five steps.

Firstly, it would entail identifying land readily available from land already in the market; land where the farmer was under severe financial pressure; land held by an absentee landlord willing to exit; and land in a deceased estate.

“In this way, land can be found without distorting markets.”

Secondly, the state would buy the land at 50% of its market value. This, Zuma said, would be closer to its fair productive value.

The current owner’s shortfall would be made up by cash or in-kind contributions from the commercial farmers in the district who volunteered to participate.

Thirdly, in exchange, commercial farmers would be protected from losing their land and gain black economic empowerment status.

“This should remove the uncertainty and mistrust that surrounds land reform and the related loss of investor confidence.

Fourthly, a stepped-up programme of financing should also be created, Zuma said. This would involve the Treasury, the Land Bank, and established white farmers.

“The model envisages that the cost of land reform be spread between all stakeholders.

“It also envisages new financial instruments being designed for the purpose of facilitating land reform.” These could include 40-year mortgages at preferential rates for new entrants into the markets, as well as land bonds that white farmers and others could invest in.

The fifth step was increasing investment in agricultural research and development.

“We also need to use the investment more strategically.”

Zuma said the government looked forward to ongoing engagement with Afasa.

“So that we can develop and harness our vision for agriculture and food security together.” – Sapa