Where were Afriforum, Solidariteit, Radio Pretoria during Red October?

red_october_projby PB Prinsloo

Red October Pretoria was a huge success, as hoped for. The primary objective was to draw international attention to the situation in South Africa and the international media exposure was more than ever experienced at any other event ever before.

This truly is history in the making. The presidency accepted the memorandum, which is another success, because in terms of this Constitution it means they are now bound to honour it and respond.

This had nothing to do with rugby, so obviously we did not draw the crowds we would have liked to. This had nothing to do with retaining the name of a city with streets named after terrorists where drug lords rule and no one dares venture after dark, so the emotional aspect did not provide a drawing card of any sorts.

No one was making money from this, so the marketing was by word-of-mouth without marketing budgets.

Now that it is over and done with, the beans would be spilled as to why Afriforum, Solidariteit, Radio Pretoria and others boycotted this huge event aimed at making the world aware about the murders rapes, torturing, crime, discrimination against whites and the deteriorating services in this country. As for OASE, they destroyed themselves in the process by showing who and what they really are all about.

As for the groups mentioned above, they are out of my life and I never want to hear from them again or have anything to do with them, ever. They are all about working for themselves, promoting their organisations and scoring points. Their boycotting of Red October and particularly the manner in which they went about it, was enough evidence to convince me that they do not give a damn about you and I, they are in it all for themselves and for their little organisations and movements, but wait for the beans to be spilled on that issue.

What Red October has also showed us, is that there is a HUGE world-wide awakening regarding the genocide against whites, not only in South Africa, but globally.

The international support was beyond our wildest expectations. This was by far the most successful international awareness project ever launched in South Africa and I am humbled by the efforts of Sunette Bridges, who proved her worth to the ultimate level of success. This cost her not only financially, but in terms of time, effort, emotionally and physical exertion all at the same time.

Is this the end of Red October? No this is only just the beginning. It will grow from strength to strength from here onwards. Sunette Bridges did this in three weeks, now we have a year to prepare for the next one. Hopefully by that time most whites would have woken up to the realities of this country.

As for unity Red October proved for the first time that unity among whites was possible Never before had we seen so many different organisations, people, activists, artists, movements and businesses coming together for the same cause, the survival of the whites in South Africa.

Those who are serious about our survival and our future all took part, did their part, played their role and got involved.

This morning’s march was more than just memorable, Sunatte’s speech was something everyone should have heard, it was from the heart, honest, sincere and to the point.

Steve was his own passionate self as always, and telling as it is, even challenging government at times.

Henk van de Graaf handled the international media on farm murders in his usual highly professional manner spilling the facts and the detail.

Red October is here to stay. There are still a few events in other countries, but the USA, Europe, New Zealand and South Africa have had their turn and it was amazing!

Those who decided to boycott it, well forever hold your peace. You had your chance and you showed us how selfish you really are.

Thank you Sunette Bridges (and your husband, Chris) for having put this together and for everyone who played a role, who did not just sit around moaning and complaining, but actually got involved.

See you here same time, next year.

Red October march calls for end to black violence

Sunette Bridges
Sunette Bridges

Almost 600 Afrikaners marched on the Union Buildings on Thursday to protest white genocide. The Red October group released hundreds of red balloons to mark the day while calling for tolerance and warned against hate speech and racism.

The mostly white Afrikaner group, organised by Afrikaans singer Sunette Bridges, delivered a memorandum calling for an end to black-on-white violence and what it termed reverse racial discrimination in education and employment.

“We are not denying that they are being murdered, but they are not being murdered by white people,” said Bridges, when asked why the focus was on white, and especially farm, murders. “And if they were murdered by white people, the international community would have an absolute freak-out.”

The group and its organisers had come under fire from other Afrikaans constituencies for appropriating a traditionally communist slogan for its name on what in previous years had been celebrated as Kruger Day, the birthday of Boer resistance leader Paul Kruger.

Organisers said they were fighting for the rights of minorities, and not protesting black rule.

“Everyone is welcome here,” said popular Afrikaans singer Steve Hofmyer, who acted as a celebrity draw card for the event. “We march to prove that there are South Africans left who won’t acclimatise to the sub-standard.”

Despite arguments that the event was intended to advance minority rights in general, the focus was very much on the rape and murder of white people by black people, something organisers did not shy away from characterising as genocide.

Hofmyer said white people faced an exaggerated threat.

“Immaterial of the statistics, we are not used to this mortality rate, we are not used to being raped in these numbers,” he said.

Crime affects everyone in South Africa, he told the crowd, but Afrikaners had the right to count their own dead. “If we say all deaths should be counted, why do we count the rhinos and not count all dead animals?”

Dr Dan Roodt from Praag said Afrikaners had been disenfranchised and were not allowed to have their own municipalities even in towns and cities where they were the majority population.

“As someone said, even in the reserves, American Indians are permitted to run their own affairs,” he stated. “Yet we are universally denied any say in the running of the country our forefathers built.”

Dr Roodt
Dr Dan Roodt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RO5
Her placard says it all…

 

 

Red balloons against the Union Buildings, seat of South Africa's government
Red balloons against the Union Buildings, seat of South Africa’s government

 

During the march, the crowd sang Afrikaans folk songs such as 'Sarie Marais', 'Die lied van jong Suid-Afrika', 'Oukraalliedjie', 'Bobbejaan klim die berg' and many others.
During the march, the crowd sang Afrikaans folk songs such as ‘Sarie Marais’, ‘Die lied van jong Suid-Afrika’, ‘Oukraalliedjie’, ‘Bobbejaan klim die berg’ and many others.

 

Famous Afrikaans singer Steve Hofmeyr being interviewed by the media
Famous Afrikaans singer Steve Hofmeyr being interviewed by the media

 

This protestor simulated some wounds
This protestor simulated some wounds
redOctober3
Most liberal pundts denounced the protest as ‘racist’ for being white, but the march in Cape Town contained a few people of colour

 

Rising red balloons signified the end of the protest in Pretoria
Rising red balloons signified the end of the protest in Pretoria

 

 

 

 

 

Petition: Free speech for Sunette Bridges! Spraakvryheid vir Sunette!

Sunette Bridges
Sunette Bridges

Petition in support of Sunette Bridges. Fill in your name and e-mail, then click on “Sign Now”. Also tweet and share on Facebook by using the buttons on the far left of this page.

[emailpetition id=”4″]
[signaturelist id=”4″]

My verklaring oor Cancervive

deur Sunette Bridges

Hierdie is seker een van die moeilikste skrywes wat ek nog ooit moes doen. Ek het baie tyd spandeer daaraan om mooi te dink en hard gebid vir leiding oor die saak.

Ek het eergister op FB gemeld dat ek vandag in Naboomspruit optree ten bate van Cancervive. Ek is deur ‘n Boervrou in die gemeenskap genader op die optrede vir haar te doen om te help met die kaartjieverkope. Ek het ingestem om gratis vir haar te gaan optree. Hierdie vrou het self die pad van Kanker gestap en wou graag ‘n bydrae maak om dit vir ander moontlik te maak om behandeling te ontvang. Soos baie van julle seker weet, het my Pa ook Kanker gehad en is dit een van die sake wat ek al vir baie jare met graagte ondersteun.

Gistermiddag het ek ‘n oproep van my kliënt ontvang om my mee te deel dat Cancervive haar versoek het om onmiddelik my optrede vandag te kanselleer omdat hulle nie met my politieke oortuigings vereenselwig wil word nie. Die arme vrou was ongelooflik ontsteld en geweldig bekommerd oor wat sy vandag vir die mense gaan se oor hoekom ek nie by die funksie is nie. Ek was hartseer, maar het vir haar gese dat sy nie bekommerd moet wees nie en dat ek op enige ander datum in die toekoms gratis vir die mense sal kom sing. Ek het die saak daar gelaat.

‘n Rukkie later is ek meegedeel dat die besluit van Cancervive ‘n direkte uitvloeisel is van ‘n e-pos van deur ‘n ene Johan Pienaar aan Cancervive se publisiteitsmaatskappy gestuur is. In die e-pos deel Pienaar Cancervive mee dat hy geskok is om te verneem dat hulle geassosieer word met ‘n RASSIS soos ek wat deur die MRK aangekla word vir rassisme en voeg hy ook by dat hy ontevrede is met die feit dat die funksie in die AP-Kerk in Naboomsptuit se kerksaal gehou word aangesien die ook ‘n Rassistiese instansie is. Cancervive het egter gekies om nie kapsie te maak oor die saal nie, maar wel oor my optrede daar.

Daar is ‘n blad op FB wat jou al vir presies 11 maande ‘n smeerveldtog teen my voer en ek het verneem dat die e-pos op die blad gepubliseer is en hul hul lesers aangemoedig het om ook almal aan Cancervive te skryf om hul te versoek om nie met my te assosieer nie. Enkele lede van die blad het dit ook goedgedink om dieselfde skrywes op Cancervive se FB blad te gaan maak. Cancervive se eerste amptelike reaksie was om die persone mee te deel dat hulle A-polities is en ondersteuning van enigeen verwelkom. Dis nou blykbaar enigeen behalwe ek.

Die spreker van Cancervive het intussen in Naboomsruit opgedaag en dit was aan haar verduidelik dat my kliënt in ‘n reuse verknorsing was agv hul houding jeens my. Die dame, by name Frieda Henning, het my toe gekontak. Sy het vreeslik hard probeer om vir my te verduidelik dat Cancervive nie omgee van watter geloofs- of politiese oortuiging hul bydraers is nie, maar dat my deelname vir hulle in ‘n moeilike posisie plaas. Ek het aan haar verduidelik dat ek reeds ‘n e-pos aan Cancervive oor die situasie gestuur het en dat ek ‘n amptelike verklaring van hulle versoek oor hoekom my optrede gekanselleer is. Cancervive het egter alles in hul vermoeë gedoen om ‘n amptelike uitlating te vermy en my sowaar vesoek om steeds maar die vertoning te kom doen so in die stilligheid sonder dat hulle skriftelik hoef te reageer oor die insident. Dit terwyl hulle personeel reeds e-posse van die Smeerblad se lede geantwoord het waarin hulle die mense meegedeel het dat dit EK was wat my optrede gekanselleer het. Ek stel dit onomwonde dat ek op geen stadium my optrede daar gekanselleer het nie, maar dat die versoek vir my om nie daar te wees nie, ‘n direkte opdrag aan my kliënt van Cancervive af was.

Wat my stomslaan is dat Cancervive blykbaar GEEN probleem het daarmee om WIT mense in Naboomspruit, boonop lede van die APKerk, se geld te vat vir hul organisasie nie, maar nie die rugraat het om ‘n stadpunt in te neem teen ‘n ooglopende kwaadwillige smeerveldtog nie. Ek sou graag die optrede van die Smeerblad se lede as laakbaar wou beskryf, maar dit sou beteken dat ‘n mense beter van hulle sou verwag en dit is nie die geval nie. Wat ek wel laakbaar vind is die optrede van Cancervive.

Op geen stadium het ek navraag gedoen oor wie sou baat by my optrede nie. Vir my het dit oor die SAAK gegaan. Ek het ook besluit om nou eers hierdie skrywe te doen om sodoende nie vir Marinda, my kliënt in Naboomspruit enige skade te berokken of haar funksie in die wiele te ry nie, maar voel dat dit nou belangrik is om ‘n standpunt in te neem teen hierdie organisasie se optrede en die publiek in te lig oor die aangeleentheid. Ons velkleur is verkeerd vir hierdie BEE instansie. Ons politiek is verkeerd vir hierdie BEE instansie, maar duidelik is die kleur van ons geld vir hulle geen probleem nie. Dit is tyd ons ons begin om SLEGS Volkseie aksies te ondersteun en na ons eie mense om moet sien en, soos in die geval van Naspers, moet PRAAT met ons geld!

Die R25 000 wat Cancervive uit Naboomspruit se Blanke mense maak, behoort in totaal aan die gemeenskap terugbetaal te word!

Ek dank die Vader dat ek NIE afhanklik is van my sangloopbaan om te oorleef nie en dat ek dus nooit nodig sal he om my beginsels prys te gee om my siel te verkoop om te oorleef nie.

Hier is die skakel na die fotoalbum met al die detail oor hierdie siek mense se optrede… Sx