Most Americans support affirmative action

affirmativeactionPRINCETON, N.J. — Two-thirds of Americans think college applicants should be admitted based solely on merit, yet most approve of affirmative action, a Gallup poll indicates.

Twenty-eight percent of Americans think a college applicant’s race and ethnic background should be a factor when granting admission to promote diversity on college campuses.

Seventy-five percent of whites and 59 percent of Hispanics believe applicants should be evaluated based on merit alone, while black people are more evenly divided on the topic, the poll said.

In a separate question, Americans largely support the idea of affirmative action programs more generally. Fifty-eight percent of Americans support affirmative action, including 51 percent of whites, 76 percent of blacks and 69 percent of Hispanics.

Democrats are twice as likely as Republicans to favor such programs, the poll found.

“Americans are not averse to having the government take steps to help improve the conditions of minority groups in the United States, and in a broad sense express support for affirmative action programs,” Gallup said. “One of the clearest examples of affirmative action in practice is colleges’ taking into account a person’s racial or ethnic background when deciding which applicants will be admitted.

“Americans seem reluctant to endorse such a practice, and even blacks, who have historically been helped by such programs, are divided on the matter.”

Gallup interviewed 4,373 adults by telephone for the survey between June 13 and July 5. There was a 2 percentage point margin of error. – UPI

Oklahoma voters to wipe out all affirmative action?

Affirmative actionOKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — Oklahoma voters will decide in November on a Republican-backed proposal to wipe out all affirmative action programs in state government, a move that many opponents say is designed only to stoke racial tensions and drive white, conservative voters to the polls.

The GOP-controlled Legislature voted in 2011 to send the proposal to a vote of the people over the objection of Democrats who argued there already was a prohibition on racial or gender quotas in state government and that such a change was unnecessary.

“I think as a state we need to take the lead in showing that we don’t look at the color of people’s skin; we look at their qualifications,” said state Sen. Rob Johnson, R-Kingfisher, who sponsored the proposal. “The only way we’re going to get past racism and get people not to see the color difference is to get our government to lead by example.”

The bill drew fierce opposition from Democrats during spirited debate in the Legislature and led to a formal reprimand of Republican state Rep. Sally Kern who, during debate in support of the bill, questioned whether there were disproportionately high numbers of blacks in prison because “they didn’t want to work hard in school.” Kern also said women don’t work as hard as men because they “tend to think a little bit more about their families.”

Kern later delivered a tearful apology on the House floor, and then voted for her own reprimand.

Democrats maintain placing such a hot button state question on the ballot is a political ploy to draw more conservative voters to the polls.

“(Republicans) have obviously had success in past election cycles where they’ve put some contentious issue on the ballot which generated excitement or fear from their base and created a big turnout from their side,” said Oklahoma Democratic Party Chairman Wallace Collins. “I think they’re trying to utilize that tactic to basically influence elections across the state.”

But Johnson disputes that claim.

“That’s absolutely ridiculous,” Johnson said. “It doesn’t have anything to do with elections or trying to get people out to vote. This issue isn’t a Republican versus Democrat kind of issue.

“I think this is something the people of Oklahoma should decide, and I think it’s important enough to put on the ballot.”

State officials say even if the proposal passes, it won’t have an impact on any state hiring or bidding practices, although it could lead to the elimination of some scholarships at public universities that target minority students and women.

An annual report on the demographic profile of state employees versus the general population still will be produced and the state’s Human Capital Management division will continue to recruit a diverse and inclusive workforce, said Shelly Reeves, a spokeswoman for Office of Management and Enterprise Services, the agency formerly known as the Office of State Finance.

“Whether the state question passes or not, we will not change those practices,” Reeves said.

But the proposal has riled many in Oklahoma’s minority community who contend that racism is alive and well in the state and that the ballot proposal only serves to enflame racial tension.

“If we’re living in a post-racial society, then why do minorities and women continue to be at the top of every bad list and at the bottom of every good list?” Lawrence Ware, a philosophy professor at Oklahoma State University and a pastor of Prospect Missionary Baptist Church, asked a mostly African-American audience during a forum last week at Langston University’s Oklahoma City campus. “If we are in a post-racial society, why is it African-Americans make up 13 percent of the U.S. population but over 40 percent of the prison population?

“No, we’re not living in a post-racial society. Just because there is a black face in a high place, it does not mean that we have overcome.”

Evidence suggests women and minorities in Oklahoma do face discrimination in employment, home ownership and education, according to a 2012 study by the Henderson Center for Social Justice at the University of California’s Berkeley Law.

According to the study, the African-American unemployment rate in Oklahoma was more than double that of white Oklahomans in 2010, and white women, and minority men and women all earn “substantially less” per year than white men. The poverty rates for blacks and Hispanics also is more than double the rate for whites, and minority children are more likely to attend low-performing schools, the study shows.

“There is ample evidence that disparity is still prevalent in the state of Oklahoma,” the study concludes. “While there are some promising trends in the public sector, it is clear that discrimination and disparity have not yet been fully remedied in housing, education, employment and other sectors.”

The study also cites research from other states that have enacted similar bans, including California, Washington, Nebraska and Michigan, that suggests “affirmative action bans limit the opportunities available to people of color and women.”

French very pessimistic about the future

Reuters) – The French are bleaker about their country’s future than at any time since 2005, a new poll showed on Saturday, with 68 percent saying they are “rather” or “very” pessimistic, the highest level ever in the initial months of a new presidency.

The poll’s findings jibed with a survey released last weekend which found that Socialist President Francois Hollande’s approval rating had slipped to 54 percent, continuing a steady decline since he took office in May.

The level of pessimism fell just short of an all-time high of 70 percent registered in August 2005, when the poll was created near the end of Jacques Chirac’s government.

Hollande’s government has been reeling from unemployment at a 13-year high and a rash of job cuts in recent weeks at top employers like carmaker Peugeot and retailer Carrefour . The government launched a plan this week to create 150,000 state-sponsored jobs for youth.

Only 34 percent of those surveyed were confident in the government’s ability to battle unemployment, and just 20 percent expect the government to be able to improve their buying power.

“It’s the first time that anxiety is so high at the beginning of a presidential mandate,” said polling firm Ifop, which conducted the survey for Dimanche Ouest France newspaper, in a statement accompanying the findings.

Pessimism stood at just 34 percent at the equivalent point in Chirac’s presidency in 2002 and 50 percent in Nicolas Sarkozy’s in 2007, the firm said.

The government’s efforts to spur consumption have been complicated by its EU deficit-cutting commitments, which mean hitting a 3 percent deficit target next year. That will force it to find some 30 billion euros ($37.8 billion) in deficit cuts next year, half of which it has said would come from spending.

The poll found that the pessimism extended even to 58 percent of Socialist party supporters.

Nearly 60 percent lacked confidence in the government’s ability to strengthen law and order, which has emerged as a concern in the wake of riots last month in the city of Amiens.

Those surveyed were asked: “In thinking about the future, for you and your children, would you say that you are very optimistic, rather optimistic, rather pessimistic or very pessimistic,” along with queries about their confidence in the government’s ability to make progress on various issues.

The poll was based on the views of 1,004 people aged 18 and over, interviewed Aug. 30 and 31.