How art helped construct Afrikaner nationalism in apartheid South Africa

Brenda Schmahmann, University of Johannesburg; Federico Freschi, University of Otago, and Lize van Robbroeck, Stellenbosch University

In this revised extract from the introduction to Troubling Images: Visual Culture and the Politics of Afrikaner Nationalism, the book’s editors assess how art and design helped forge Afrikaner nationalism.

In Banal Nationalism British academic Michael Billig writes, “If the future remains uncertain, we know the past history of nationalism. And that should be sufficient to encourage a habit of watchful suspicion.”

This warning has perhaps never been truer or more relevant than in the second decade of the new millennium. It has been characterised by a marked turn towards right-wing populism and nationalism.

The historical context and circumstances underlying the rise of Afrikaner nationalism belong to a different era of international politics. But it is essentially rooted in the experience of a people who were denied social and economic power. They were people whose political and cultural agency was marginalised by the imperialist agenda.

Indeed, hindsight shows that both the imperialist establishment and the international community were slow to understand the depth of Afrikaner humiliation in the aftermath of the South African War.

Consequently, they were unprepared for the meteoric rise of Afrikaner nationalism in the first three decades of the twentieth century.

Against the backdrop of resurgent nationalist sentiments across the world, it seems opportune to reassess the mechanisms through which it established and sustained itself. This is important, if only as a reminder of the need to pay attention to the risks that are posed to liberal democracy.

A painting by Jacobus Hendrik Pierneef, often commissioned by the apartheid state to create work for government buildings.
Kandukuru Nagarjun/Flickr

Theorists in the humanities have done extensive work understanding the impetuses and effects of Afrikaner nationalism and identities. But no prior book that we have encountered has been dedicated exclusively to a critical engagement with a broad range of visual manifestations and responses to Afrikaner nationalism.

Visual culture and politics

Troubling Images focuses on manifestations of Afrikaner nationalism in paintings, sculptures, monuments, cartoons, photographs, illustrations and exhibitions. In doing so it offers a much-needed critical account of the relationship between Afrikaner nationalist visual culture and Afrikaner political and cultural domination in South Africa.

Visual culture was one important mechanism for rationalising and normalising apartheid and the Afrikaner nationalist ideology that supported it. It was a domain that was multifaceted and wide-ranging. It extended from imagery accessed in private homes via print culture and television to what might be encountered in public via monuments, sculptures and art exhibitions.

Preparation of the CR Swart sculpture by Cigdem Aydemir for Plastic Histories, 2014. The work is in the process of being sprayed pink.
Paul Mills

Apartheid South Africa was a context in which images that challenged the status quo tended to be suppressed, and their authors threatened. It also celebrated visual discourse associated with Afrikaner nationalist ideals and values.

There were limited chances for South Africans to view state propaganda through a critical outsider lens. The country’s pariah status, as well as academic and cultural boycotts, limited opportunities for international connections.

The impact of whiteness

White South Africans who were born and reached maturity during the apartheid years tend to recognise the full impact only with hindsight. Repeated exposure to a slanted rhetoric meant that even those who sought to criticise nationalistic views were influenced by its biases.

In an article titled How do I Live in This Strange Place? published some 16 years ago, Samantha Vice called for shame and a retreat from public life as the appropriate response by white South Africans to the horrific racial injustices perpetrated in their interests.

Though controversial, her position highlights the fact that a decade after apartheid ended people were still coming to terms with the long-term impact of its rule.

Taal (Language) I (detail), 2012 by Mea Ox. The work uses the form of the Afrikaans Language Monument in South Africa.
Mea Ox/Lizamore & Associates

For white South Africans, this involved critically engaging with questions about their own culpability. The growth in critical whiteness studies in the new millennium is surely also tied to a need to interrogate debates in South Africa prior to 1994. And that includes its visual ones.

It stands to reason that the current retrieval of a positive blackness from decades of systematically imposed inferiority should be accompanied by a critical reconsideration of whiteness and its strategies of domination and control.

The living monuments

Images celebrating Afrikaner nationalist imagery remain visible – and sometimes even prominent – in South Africa. The public domain still includes numerous sculptural commemorations of key figures within a white Afrikaner imaginary.

South Africa retains architectural monuments of significant scale. There’s the Voortrekker Monument in Pretoria, the Women’s Monument in Bloemfontein and the Language Monument in Paarl. Their retention can be understood in light of the National Heritage Resources Act (1999). It sought “to enable and encourage communities to nurture and conserve their legacy so that it may be bequeathed to future generations”.

The controversial statue of Cecil John Rhodes being removed from the University of Cape Town amid protests in 2015.
Charlie Shoemaker/Getty Images

But the appropriateness of this approach has increasingly been questioned. Since the removal of Marion Walgate’s sculpture of Cecil John Rhodes from the University of Cape Town, many of South Africa’s monuments have suffered some form of desecration.

In such a context, the discussion of Afrikaner nationalism and visual imagery undertaken in this book seems timely.

Troubling Images: Visual Culture and the Politics of Afrikaner Nationalism is available from Wits University Press. Order a copy over here.The Conversation

Brenda Schmahmann, Professor and the SARChI Chair in South African Art and Visual Culture, University of Johannesburg; Federico Freschi, Professor and Head of College of Art, Design & Architecture, University of Otago, and Lize van Robbroeck, Professor, Stellenbosch University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

ANC proposes Jurassic Park of white symbols and statues

The ANC government’s proposed plan to rid the country of white statues and symbols includes the appointment of a task team to ensure the acceleration of the process of identification‚ consultation and relocation of statues for a period of between a minimum of three years and a maximum of not more than five years.

Above all‚ the plan includes a special programme to be established to celebrate African history “on the continental scale” to affirm black identity‚ as an antidote for white South African “exceptionalism”.

The term “exceptionalism” alludes to a recently coined phrase depicting Neocons in the US, and has little to do with South Africa or the besieged white minority in the country. The use of the term nevertheless indicates the regime’s level of confusion.

An audit of existing names‚ symbols and sites will be made “to identify those that are considered offensive”, meaning white. These will need to be changed within a specified period, the regime says.

In the instances where there may be “a need for disposal of some of the symbols and statues‚ proper disposal processes and guideline policies will be designed”.

An anti-white racial campaign will thus be launched together with a series of vigorous public re-education sessions.

The establishment of a historical theme park, a kind of Jurassic Park, giving a detailed history and narrative of the evolution of the South African society is part of the scheme.

Transformation of the heritage landscape will be informed and replaced by black and gay symbols or themes that focus on unity, the ANC says.

It’s a crime to deface statues says jugde

The High Court in Pretoria granted an urgent application on Tuesday interdicting the EFF or any other members of the public to deface monuments and statues across the country.

Neither the EFF nor its leader filed papers to oppose the application, and as no council for the EFF were in court, Judge Eben Jordaan granted the order.

The application came in the wake of several monuments and statues being vandalised and defaced across the country, including the statue of Paul Kruger on Church Square in Pretoria.

Judge Jordaan remarked that it remained a crime to vandalise and deface statues.

Source: IOL

‘Racist Gandhi must fall’

A group of people wearing ANC caps brazenly defaced a statue of Mahatma Gandhi that stands opposite the party’s Johannesburg offices in Gandhi Square on Sunday.

This was on the day that a bust of the Indian peace figure was unveiled in Hannover, Germany, by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

The group drove into the square in a dark grey Renault hatchback at about noon and jumped out carrying 1-litre and 5-litre tins of paint, and placards that read: “Racist Gandhi must fall.”

They threw the white paint on the bust and then left, only to return an hour later with more paint in plastic bags, to make it easier to throw.

They also defaced a nearby plaque that contained information about the work Ghandi did in the country, by painting it.

As the group tried to flee, one of them was caught.

“He dropped a set of keys and fell behind the others. We managed to catch him, but he wasn’t worried or afraid,” said Ntandazo Khwephe from Top Ten Security.

Khwephe said the group looked familiar, especially the one they caught.

“I’m used to seeing him around the ANC offices. He said he’s not worried because he’ll just make a call and his leader will get him out of prison. He was relaxed, and said they know what they’re doing. They said we shouldn’t stop them because Gandhi was a racist,” Khwephe said.

One of Gandhi’s major “achievements” in South Africa was to promote racial segregation by refusing to share a post office door with the blacks.

As a Sgt. Major in the British Army he eagerly participated in the 1906 British war against the black Zulus.

Gandhi wrote extensively about his experiences with the blacks of South Africa. He always termed them “Kaffirs” and his writings reveal a deep-seated disdain for all African natives.

ANC spokesman Keith Khoza said on Sunday night that the party condemned the attack and did not believe members of the party would partake in such an act.

“It’s not possible for anyone from the ANC to deface any statues because we have been clear on the matter. We have stated that any people who have problems with statues should engage in direct discussions with the community in the area,” said Khoza, who added that the defacers might be imposters.

“Anyone could wear ANC merchandise. We condemn whoever was arrested and call for police to do their duty,” he said.

Police spokesman Lieutenant Kay Makhubela said the man arrested would be charged with malicious damage to property.

“The 21-year-old will appear in court on Monday ,” he said.

Gandhi is idolized by African-Americans and his life is popularly considered a model for the American Civil Rights Movement.

U.S. Senator Harry Reid called Gandhi “a giant in morality.”

South African leader Nelson Mandela called Gandhi “the archetypal anticolonial revolutionary” whose “nonviolent resistance inspired anticolonial and antiracist movements.”

Obama reportedly keeps a picture of Gandhi in his office.

Meanwhile Parliament called for calm and conciliation in the statue debate, urging South Africans to remember the legacy of Nelson Mandela.

“Parliament calls on all South Africans to follow the example set by the country’s leadership under the late president Nelson Mandela, and find political solutions in dealing with sensitive and emotive issues such as the country’s statues,” the legislature said on Sunday.

Parliament added that Mandela championed “nation-building and reconciliation”, and said it would approach the debate in that spirit.

“All of us have a duty to work expeditiously to correct all past injustices and acknowledge the pain of our people.

“We also have a duty to uphold the laws of our country and work towards social cohesion, and avoid counter-productive actions that could polarise our society.”

Source: IOL