Maidan Square – praag.org

Ukraine: The coup to install billionaires

By Dmitri Menin.

It has long been known that revolutions are carried out by romantics, and their fruits harvested by cynics. But Ukraine has now put them all to shame with the unbelievable speed with which it has rushed from romanticism to cynicism. The final few dazed revolutionaries are still wandering across Maidan Square shouting «Down with thieves and oligarchs!» and «Long live the government of national confidence», while at the same time it is these same oligarchs who are confidently taking up the more substantial government posts, such as multimillionaire Arsen Avakov, for example, who has been appointed Minister of Internal Affairs, as well as getting entire regions to feed on, such as billionaires Ihor Kolomoyskyi in Dnepropetrovsk and Sergey Taruta in Donetsk. The other appointees may have fewer millions at the moment, but they will soon catch up. New changes are also afoot. The New York Times reports that the nomination of Vadim Novinsky, the owner of Smart Holding Company whose net worth is estimated to be USD 1.9 billion, for the post of Kiev’s representative to Crimea is on the cards.

There is a rumour that the author of this ‘forced’ staffing strategy is former prisoner Yulia Tymoshenko, who went to see the people on Maidan Square in a wheelchair, but who was able to stand and walk about in the American Embassy. It turns out that is the place where one can breathe the salubrious air of freedom. It is assumed that the oligarchs, who represent the country’s business elite, will be able to exert a controlling influence over workers in eastern Ukraine. Yuriy Lutsenko, an ally of the magically-cured maiden Yulia Tymoshenko, has said that the reason oligarch’s are being appointed is so that big business can be as involved as possible in protecting the country’s territorial integrity, which will not just make use of public resources, but all available private resources as well. Only now, something tells us that this plan is far from spontaneous and that this is exactly the reason why the turmoil and undertaking took place to begin with. And as far as which citizens are primarily going to be saved by these private and public resources, there is absolutely no doubt at all – the most worthy, which is to say the oligarchs themselves. In essence, the era of the complete triumph of the oligarchy in Ukraine has arrived. Masks are being thrown off even more quickly than any kind of decency allows. There is a terrible hurry before the people befuddled by the incense of the burning tyres finally see the light. By then, however, it may very well be too late.

Simon Jenkins, a journalist for The Guardian, writes: «Romantics sometimes refer to the «wisdom of crowds», but they ignore the capacity of totalitarians to manipulate the masses to their will. They forget the hysteria and cruelty of which programmed crowds are capable. Any upheaval can offer the hope of better times. But history is always a sceptic».

Despair is discernible in the words of one of those who took part in the events in Ukraine: «In any case, good intentions like these without any constructive suggestions to take and create a people’s council, popular control or a people’s government are going to be faced with the fact that foreigners are once again going to end up in these public offices.

«Because the trend of Ukrainian desperation lies in the fact that the vermin we for some reason keep electing to govern us do not come from outer space. They live among us! Which is why any recombination of elements that make up the current system of power, which is represented by a political circle of particularly active, deceitful and cynical vermin, is going to come to nothing».

Another disillusioned revolutionary believes that «Maidan is probably waiting for the next grandiose ‘flop’ – something like what happened in 2005. There is no ‘elite’ in Ukraine that would be able to replace the corrupt domestic bedlam. The ‘Donetsk clan’ has been moved aside, and the ‘liubi druzi’ (the ‘dear friends’ of Viktor Yushchenko) are returning. What’s more, they are clearly hungry for revenge and in the mood for it. These are the same ‘liubi druzi’ that successfully ‘carved’ and ‘sawed’ under Tymoshenko in the previous attempt. Except that while they came to power in 2005 under the slogan ‘the Orange Revolution’, now they are chomping at the bit under the rhetoric of Maidan. Tymoshenko was released after all the human fatalities, and she and Turchynov were immediately hoisted to the top of the power pyramid. What is that about? Why such an unprecedented honour? Who exactly are these Elders of Zion? Whilst averting their eyes, some deputies say that such figures exist. All the rest are a closely guarded secret».

But they are not being kept secret any more. Let us look at two of them now.

The new head of the Dnipropetrovsk Regional State Administration is Israeli citizen Ihor Kolomoyskyi, a well-known Ukrainian businessman and head of the European Jewish Council. He is ranked the second richest person in Ukraine (2013) with a net worth of USD 3.645 billion. He is a member of various supervisory boards, the co-owner of PrivatBank, the Neftekhimik-Prykarpattya oil refinery, and the oil and gas extracting company Ukrnafta, the vice-president of the Football Federation of Ukraine, and, according to a number of political analysts, one of the most influential people in Ukraine. It was Kolomoyskyi who was always the financial sponsor of the ‘Yulia Tymoshenko’ political project. He lives in Switzerland. The fact that his PrivatBank was one of the first major lending institutions in the country to stop issuing money to the people because of the ‘Maidan troubles’ is evidence of how much of his own money Kolomoyskyi is willing to share with the people of Ukraine. In reality, he needs additional money himself to rectify affairs in his business empire. Much to the joy of Kiev’s new rulers, he has already registered his presence through his offensive remarks towards Russian president Vladimir Putin. Evidently there will be no point waiting for money, only insults.

Sergey Taruta has been appointed the governor of Donetsk region and is co-owner of the Industrial Union of Donbas Corporation, as well as president of FC Metalurh Donetsk. In February 2008, his net worth was USD 2.65 billion and Taruta ranked 8th in the Top-130 Richest Ukrainians. After the global financial crisis, however, his net worth fell dramatically to approximately USD 750 million. He is urgently in need of fresh infusions to restore his former greatness and save his assets. Governing a region as affluent as Donetsk will give him a good chance to do this, where he will be busy collecting objects of ‘high antiquity’. For this reason, he has spent a long time getting closer to former Ukrainian president Viktor Yushchenko.

Looking at these men, and knowing that it is these men who are standing behind the regime’s main figures, you start to wonder why Turchynov and Yatsenyuk are referring to themselves as a «kamikaze government» quite so insistently, and giving themselves a political life of 3-4 months. Why had it been necessary to rush to power quite so fiercely? Acting President Alexander Turchynov says that the provisional government is doomed because it will have to implement unpopular decisions. «Not those promised by the populists, but those that are needed to save Ukraine from default and restore the faith of creditors and investors. It will be criticised and vilified, but it must fulfil its duties and burn for the sake of Ukraine». Once again there is the question of whether it is for the sake of Ukraine or for the sake of its most worthy sons like Kolomoyskyi, Taruta and others. Yatsenyuk has already announced the unconditional acceptance of all IMF conditions, which will have a serious impact on the further deterioration of life for the Ukrainian people. But then on the other hand, fresh money will be received to save big business, which will then move along the already familiar route to offshore accounts and precious safety deposit boxes that will be hidden much more securely than those of the simpleton Yanukovych. It seems that the ‘kamikaze’ of Turchynov and Yatsenyuk is not going to involve anything except cutting out coupons to transfer power to the oligarchs.

And as far as Maidan’s «Circle of National Trust» is concerned, do they really believe in this fairytale about the fat cats being saviours of the homeland? After until, until fairly recently its leaders had been saying that Ukraine’s new government of national confidence would be closed to anyone on the list of the 100 richest people in Ukraine. Well what are they keeping quiet for?

They, for example, announced that they were going to convene a national popular assembly on Maidan Square on 2 March to listen to a report on the first results of the new government’s work. «And let Turchynov, Yatsenyuk, Tyahnybok, Klitschko and Avakov just try not to come!» it said in a statement on their social network site. People did actually gather on the square. But what did they talk about? About deflecting the threat of Russian ‘aggression’, both invented and over-exaggerated, seemingly so that no kind of report could be given. In truth, nobody has stuttered anything at all about the results of the new government’s work. And maybe nobody is going to ask, either. So what did the young people from the «Heavenly Hundred» and Berkut actually die for?

Will Baroness Ashton of Upholland lead the nuclear charge?

Baroness Catherine Ashton — Catherine Ashton adjusting her GU crown

When Victoria Nuland rejected the EU solutions in Ukraine with her “Fuck the EU” comment, the EU went it alone. Germany’s Foreign Minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier proposed that he and his French counterpart, Laurent Fabius, fly to Kiev and try to reach a resolution of the violence before escalation. Polish Foreign Minister, Radoslaw Sikorski was asked to join.

The talks in Kiev included the EU delegation, Yanukovich, the three opposition leaders and a Russian representative. The US was not invited.

Then suddenly snipers began shooting into the crowd in Maidan Square. Panic ensued and riot police retreated in chaos according to eyewitnesses. Vitali Klitschko withdrew from the deal. Yanukovich fled Kiev.

Now that the “opposition” has driven a duly-elected president into exile and dissolved the national riot police, Berkut, Washington has demanded that Ukraine submit to very onerous IMF conditionalities. As Paul Craig Roberts writes:

According to a report in Kommersant-Ukraine, the finance ministry of Washington’s stooges in Kiev who are pretending to be a government has prepared an economic austerity plan that will cut Ukrainian pensions from $160 to $80 so that Western bankers who lent money to Ukraine can be repaid at the expense of Ukraine’s poor.

The corrupt Western media describes loans as “aid.” However, the 11 billion euros that the EU is offering Kiev is not aid. It is a loan. Moreover, it comes with many strings, including Kiev’s acceptance of an IMF austerity plan.

The austerity plan will cut social services, funds for education, layoff government workers, devalue the currency, thus raising the prices of imports which include Russian gas, thus electricity, and open Ukrainian assets to takeover by Western corporations.

Ukraine’s agriculture lands will pass into the hands of American agribusiness.

The conflict between the US and the EU has thus been exposed.

Meanwhile Vladimir Putin has made it clear that Moscow does not need to “invade” Ukraine. The 1997 Ukraine-Russia partition treaty specifically allows Russian troops in Crimea. No shots were fired and Russian “sons” were welcomed with open arms.

The US should start worrying about the white supremacists they so ardently and openly support in Ukraine, but shun elsewhere. If the Nazi’s take over – which seem more and more likely – the UN’s R2P (responsibility to protect) will come into play. Samantha Power, the architect of R2P, should be proud of herself for crafting the ultimate solution many hawks in the US wish for.

The three war-mongering women who represent the West’s foreign policy apparatus, US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland and EU official and onetime British Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament activist Catherine Ashton, and United States Ambassador to the United Nations Samatha Power, have been exposed. The first two by leaked phone calls, and the latter by her R2P plan.

Ashton, actually the grand and feudalistic Baroness Ashton of Upholland, also has an exaggerated view of her own accomplishments. She has scant knowlegde of what transpires in Europe, but flatters herself with the inflated title of High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy for the European Union.

Her title hasn’t lifted her dour expression and gloomy features yet, but it might be as a result of her closeness to the Great Unwashed, the GU.

The Baroness is married to former British journalist Peter Kellner, an executive of the British polling company YouGov. The pollster does political polling as well as the very dull infotainment media charts of Pop Idol and X-Factor, pandering to the GU. Only in Britain could a Labourite sink to such depths of grandeur.

In a phone call between herself and the Estonian foreign minister Urmas Paet, Ashton was told what had really happened in Kiev. The High Representative could no wait to throw cold water on the information that the “opposition” – actually a NATO force with looted Libyan weapons some say – was behind the shootings of protesters and policemen.

Ashton quickly defended the new members of the Ukrainian Rada, the parliament. The Estonian Foreign Ministry in the meantime has confirmed that the transcript is authentic.

Essentially, Ashton told the Estonian foreign minister that in the Machiavellian shaping of the fake opposition in the Rada, some “cannon fodder” had been required.

Ashton’s agenda complements that of Nuland whose January phone call with US ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt revealed that the Obama administration was hand picking and paying the future government of Ukraine even while Ashton, as well as Nuland’s co-ideologue Jeffrey Feltman, the United Nations Undersecretary General for Political Affairs, were feigning interest in a negotiated solution.

Nuland sounded certain that the US would achieve its political aims with the support of America’s bought-and-paid for UN team of Feltman and his boss, Secretary General Ban Ki-moon who was known to South Korean journalists as the “slippery eel” when he served as South Korean foreign minister.

The Calcutta-born Special UN envoy to Ukraine, Dutch diplomat Robert Serry, in which Nuland expressed great confidence must also not be forgotten in the coup plot.

Thanks to the intercept capabilities of loyal and proficient Ukrainian security agents, the world now understands the perfidy of chattering women who are helping lead Europe and, possibly, the rest of the world, into a massive conflagration, possibly a nuclear war.

Russia surprised at EU refusal to comment on new leak

Kerry directing the script with Poroshenko, Klitch and Yats

Russian Foreign Ministry has expressed its surprise at the EU refusal to comment on the leaked phone conversation between the EU Foreign Policy Chief Catherine Ashton and Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet. Earlier the Estonian Foreign Ministry confirmed the authenticity of the recording that suggested the snipers who shot at protesters and police in the Ukrainian capital Kiev were allegedly hired by the new coalition, and not ousted President Yanukovich. The Voice of Russia’s political analyst Dmitriy Babich expressed his opinion.

How can you comment on this conversation?
I think it is just astounding what Mr. Paet had to say because basically the Western press has been saying for all these days that the file only came from the government side and it was taken as an axiom by most of the media in the West. And now we find out from Mr. Paet who talked to some opposition activists of the civil society actually. So they acknowledged that the bullets and the weapons used to kill on both sides were basically the same and that the main suspicion is not actually with Yanukovych but with what Mr. Paet called ‘the opposition coalition’. But I would like to remind you that part of this opposition is the neo-Nazis party called ‘Svoboda’. Until 2004 it was called National Social Party of Ukraine. If you read its program, they suggest that people should identify their ethnic origin in their passports, that what the call Ukrainophobia should be punished, should be seen as the criminal offence and they make quite a few other suggestions which remind one of the Nazi Germany.

So the opposition is actually responsible for the killings?
Well, I think basically that the main problem is the bias of the Western media because just if you watch television, if you watch the television images of these three months, you can see that these so-called peaceful protesters attacked police much more often than the police attacked them. The most typical situation is the police standing on the street blocking the path to the Presidential administration, hiding behind their shields, and the “peaceful protesters” in the Western understanding of this word, first they throw at them stones and Molotov cocktails, and then they attack them with metal chains, metal sticks and this is all just civil society on protest against the corrupt government. I am afraid this lead conversation will not be investigated for the very simple reason. The new prosecutor general of Ukraine Mr. Makhnitskiy, he is a member of the Svoboda party. So for more than a decade he believed that people should be checked for their loyalty for the Ukraine state on the lie detector, that people who lied about having a double citizenship, most likely Russian citizenship should be deprived of their property. So you can imagine what this kind of person will do with this recorded conversation. He is not going to investigate it.

Is there any chance that Maidan, which is still a force in Ukraine will somehow press the authorities, force the authorities to start the investigation?
I think that what you call Maidan is just a crowd, which can be manipulated like any crowd. And crowds are incapable of investigations. Crowds are moved by hate or love, they are moved by primitive emotions. And the crowd that we have seen in the center of Kiev for these three months was an evil crowd. Even its supporters agree that about 50% was moved because of hatred for corruption and 50% moved by hatred for Russia and Russians. I think that ethnic hate is a lot worse than corruption and certainly these people are not going to push for a fair investigation and they are not going to accept the results of a fair investigation because in their hearts they have already blamed their enemies from everything.

Let’s get back to this tape. If we listen to it carefully, to what Mr. Paet and Catherine Ashton were talking about and to what they said, they actually never said that these facts should be concealed. So probably, is there a chance that international community, the so-called international community would somehow, especially now when it is leaked, press the authorities to still investigate it?
No, I don’t believe in it because the international community had every evening lots of television images before its eyes and it continues to pronounce the same lies. They have seen the Molotov cocktails, they have seen the policemen killed and mutilated, and they continued calling these people peaceful protesters for three months. So do you think that after this huge lie they are going to investigate just one small lie that conspired in the recorded phone conversation? No, the EU and the US engaged themselves 100% on the side of the opposition. They failed to guarantee the Agreement on division of power, which was signed between Yanukovych and the opposition on the 21st of February. Their attitude is not compromised in the investigation. Their attitude is media on slot and victory. And victory under the slogan “the winner takes all”. That’s their attitude, it is extremely destructive.

If we talk about situation in Ukraine. The two politicians are actually talking about credibility of Ukrainian politicians and they also say that the only one who is more or less popular both in so-called civil society and among Maidan and also in eastern Ukraine is Mr. Poroshenko. Do you think that actually reflects the state of affairs in Ukraine that no one is popular there except for one or two people?
The problem is that all their conversation is extremely amateurish. These are the people who have very superficial knowledge of Ukrainian politics. But they feel themselves empowered to discuss and decide who is going to be the next government and their attitude is based on hear-see things like “I liked this Olga, I think she should be the next Minister of Health”. Poroshenko is sympathetic to me; I think he should be a member of the new government. That reminds me of Victoria Nuland’s conversation that was also recorded how she says to the American Ambassador in Kiev “Okay, Yatzenuk, she calls him Yatz, he started with economics, so he probably should be in the next government”. You know, Klitch, this is the way she calls Klitchko “I don’t like him. He shouldn’t be in that government”. She probably doesn’t like him because he is a boxer and that doesn’t reflect well on her image of a member of government. So this talk is just laughable, it is extremely amateurish. And I think it is tragic that these kinds of people actually decide the fate of the country that has a population of 46 million. And this people lecture Russia and they lecture Ukrainians on how they should live, how bad we all are, and this is just pathetic. This is the only word I can find for it. Pathetic.

Source: Voice of Russia

New leak: Current Ukranian leaders hired snipers

Details of a leaked phone call between EU foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton and Estonian foreign affairs minister Urmas Paet presented evidence that the US-backed opposition was responsible for hiring snipers who gunned down protesters in Kiev and not the deposed government of Viktor Yanukovich, as the media widely claimed.

More than 90 people were killed and another 900 injured during the standoff between police and protesters at Maidan Saquare in Kiev last month.

During the phone call, Paet tells Ashton that evidence presented to him by a doctor, Olga Bogomolets, who treated victims of the sniper attacks clearly indicates both police and protesters were being shot at by the same people. She has also just turned down the position of Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine for Humanitarian Affairs offered by the coup-appointed regime.

“There is now stronger and stronger understanding that behind the snipers, it was not Yanukovich, but it was somebody from the new coalition,” said Paet during the phone call.

The Estonian FM has described the whole sniper issue as “disturbing” and added, “it already discredits from the very beginning” the new Ukrainian power.

His overall impressions of what he saw during his one-day trip to Kiev are “sad,” Paet said during the conversation.

He stressed that the Ukrainian people don’t trust the Maidan leaders, with all the opposition politicians slated to join the new government “having dirty past.”

The file was reportedly uploaded to the web by officers of Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) loyal to ousted President Viktor Yanukovich who hacked Paet’s and Ashton’s phones.

“And second, what was quite disturbing, this same Olga [Bogomolets] told as well that all the evidence shows that the people who were killed by snipers from both sides, among policemen and then people from the streets, that they were the same snipers killing people from both sides,” the Estonian FM added.

Ashton reacted to the information by saying: “Well, yeah…that’s, that’s terrible.”

The true narrative therefore suggests that forces within the opposition hired the snipers in order to kill protesters and then blame the deaths on Yanukovich’s administration, thereby delegitimizing his bid to hold onto power.

This is a classic example of the kind “false flag” attack that NATO, which has vehemently sided with the opposition, perfected in Europe with Operation Gladio.

“I think we do want to investigate. I mean, I didn’t pick that up, that’s interesting. Gosh,” Ashton said in response to Paet.

A secretive British “forensic team” who refused to tell the BBC who they were working for, concluded that the Yanukovich government was responsible for the “bloodbath” before any formal results were published. There is strong reason to believe they were quickly sent in to clean up the crime scenes and destroy evidence.

Paet indicated that the newly installed government had since launched a cover-up of the sniper attacks, remarking, “They don’t want to investigate what exactly happened.”

The phone call was conducted after Paet visited Kiev on February 25 at the height of the clashes between police and protesters.