‘Radical phase of transition’ needs ‘radical and militant campaigning’ – Cosatu

Do not underestimate “enemies” seeking to create divisions before the ANC’s December elective conference in Mangaung, Cosatu president Sidumo Dlamini said on Monday.

“Comrades, we must not make a mistake and underestimate the enemy,” he told the Congress of SA Trade Unions’ (Cosatu) 11th national congress in Midrand.

“The systematic attack we see today directed at us is based on evidence of what a united alliance is capable of doing to defend and advance the NDR [National Democratic Revolution].”

But, these enemies were making a mistake, Dlamini said.

“We will not go to Mangaung divided; but we will go there with a clear class agenda to defend and advance the progressive outcomes of [the last ANC conference in] Polokwane.”

Dlamini said it was for this reason that the African National Congress, the SA Communist Party, and Cosatu, as the tripartite alliance, needed to ensure they were unified around “class interests”.

“We must not allow tactical differences to be elevated to strategic differences,” Dlamini said.

“They [the enemies] have seen what a united alliance can achieve. It is because of this proven track record of resilient struggle and victories that the rightwing and the demagogues would prefer to have us divided and weak going to the 53rd national congress of the ANC.”

He said the “plight of workers” was being used to weaken the alliance.

“The strategy includes buying the emotions of the masses and society and us[ing] that support to stab Cosatu and the liberation movement in the back and allow it to bleed to near death so that they… come as heroes to save the movement,” Dlamini said.

“We must not fall into a trap of competing with demagogues. Instead we should honestly be with the workers to listen to them and engage the employers; force them to address the demands raised by the workers.”

Cosatu’s congress should be used by workers to tell it where it had deviated from its mission.

“These four days will be your opportunity to tell us on our faces where we have deviated. An organisation becomes stronger by purging itself.”

Cosatu also had to respond to “systematic attacks” against it in the wake of the Marikana shooting, Dlamini said.

“The problem in Marikana is not rivalry between unions, nor can it simply be put as being a widening gap between leaders and members.

“This will obviously be a matter which we will have to honestly confront during our discussions, but the central issue is that workers in the mines are rising against their continued exploitation by employers,” Dlamini said.

“Mineworkers cannot be expected to keep quiet and say ‘thank you baas’ when they know that the financial officer of Lonmin, Alan Ferguson, earns R10,254,972 a year or R854,581 a month, which is 152 times higher than the salary of a rock drill operator.”

Last month, 34 striking workers were shot dead and 78 were wounded when police opened fire on them at Lonmin’s Marikana mine in North West.

“Workers… [were] simply saying we produce wealth and we want our reasonable share and they expect to be given a fair share,” Dlamini said.

“It is not just workers from North West that are speaking; this is a reflection of the demands being harboured by millions of our people.”

It was “interesting to note” that most of the richest people in South Africa came from those in charge of the mining sector.

Dlamini said the attack on Cosatu was similar to an attack on it by the Democratic Alliance, which marched to Cosatu’s headquarters in Johannesburg earlier this year.

“The majority of those in the DA march were the African people being instigated to march against other African workers,” he said.

“A strategy that was used by the apartheid government to set blacks against each other, the same strategy we saw being used at Marikana where African workers are being set against each other.”

The reality was that more than six million workers lived on less than R10 a day.

“It is for this reason that we will continue to argue that it is mistaken to think that any kind of job will reduce poverty,” Dlamini said.

“If employment is to be the primary instrument to fight poverty and inequality, then such employment will have to be decent and labour brokers cannot deliver decent jobs and similarly the youth wage subsidy cannot deliver decent jobs except making employers richer through the provision of cheap labour by our children.”

Dlamini said South Africa needed to look to models of social and economic justice used by several South American countries.

Brazil, under President Lula da Silva, defied conventional economic prescriptions, and advanced economic strategies to redistribute incomes by raising wage levels and social protection.

“The… radical phase of our transition will not happen if we do not build a radical and militant campaigning Cosatu, SACP, and ANC as mass-based organisations, which derive their perspectives from the masses,” Dlamini said.

“We need to build these as organisations that do not identify with the people out of pity, but [which are] grounded on the masses and connect with community struggles… [and build] them as fighting organisations that must continue to enjoy respect and credibility by the working class.” – Sapa

South African Communist Party calls FW de Klerk an ‘apartheid dinosaur’

Iafrica.com reports that SACP general secretary Blade Nzimande lashed out at FW de Klerk on Thursday, branding the former president an “apartheid political dinosaur”.

On Wednesday, De Klerk spoke at a briefing discussing the outcomes of the ANC’s policy conference. De Klerk said the spirit of inclusiveness and reconciliation embodied by former president Nelson Mandela was no longer prevalent in the country.

He warned against the ruling party’s national democratic revolution.

“The NDR as a concept is dangerous. A revolution against who? Who is the enemy?”

De Klerk added that the SACP was one of the driving forces behind what he called radical ANC policies.

Nzimande has since hit back, calling De Klerk “a politician who has long reached his sell-by date”.

“All what De Klerk is saying about the SACP is nothing but an attempt at resuscitating the classical, but failed, apartheid ‘rooi gevaar’ tactic which was used by his now extinct National Party and its criminal apartheid regime not only to persecute communists but as part of the whole armoury to fight against the liberation movement,” Nzimande said.

“De Klerk’s latest anti-communist burst is nothing more than rehashing this nonsense, and in fact exposing that the likes of him no longer have any relevance in today’s South Africa, if they ever did at all. Not so long ago he let the cat out of the bag by clearly stating he still firmly believes that the bantustan policies were the correct ones for South Africa.”

Praag.org previously reported that in his concluding remarks on Wedenesday, “De Klerk urged South Africans to be active and engage the ruling party on its policies, because they would shape the country’s future”.

De Klerk, Russian professor on ANC’s revolutionary doctrine

Former president FW de Klerk said on Wednesday he would have fired Basic Education Minister Angie Motshekga if he had found wrongdoing on her part in the Limpopo textbook saga.

“If I was president, I would have asked the minister of education to fully investigate and brief me,” he told reporters in Johannesburg.

“And if I had come to a conclusion that the minister of education… failed in a material way, yes, I would have fired her.”

De Klerk said the failure to deliver textbooks was purely a management issue.

“The textbooks were printed… but not delivered. That is tremendously bad management.”

De Klerk was speaking at a press briefing after a conference hosted by his foundation on Wednesday. The conference discussed the outcomes of the ANC’s policy conference.

De Klerk said the spirit of inclusiveness and reconciliation embodied by former president Nelson Mandela was no longer prevalent in the country. He warned against the ruling party’s national democratic revolution.

“The NDR as a concept is dangerous. A revolution against who? Who is the enemy?”

He said the ANC wanted to lead the country using policies which had failed elsewhere in the world.

Earlier, Irina Filatova, former head of African studies at Moscow State University, echoed De Klerk’s view on the NDR.

“The ANC cannot implement this policy. But there will be one aspect it can do, and it can destroy this country. There could be partial land reform, partial nationalisation of mines.”

Filatova said the ANC “obviously believes in this ideology” as it spoke of the unique nature of its developmental state.

“I think that the ANC is a bit lost about the second stage of the revolution. In the 1980s it was so obvious what would happen.”

She said the more the economy failed, the deeper the ANC was going to dig in its heels.

“The more failure[s] there are, the more they will try to use various means, both constitutional and unconstitutional, to keep their following,” Filatova said.

Leon Louw, executive director of the Free Market Foundation, warned that recent laws passed by the government made the South African economy less free.

Growth had been restricted by the National Credit Act, Consumer Protection Act, and exchange controls.

Louw said the country had changed the economic path it embarked on in 1994.

“Things changed after 2006 and the economy started becoming less free again. If your economy becomes more free you will grow, and if it becomes less free, you will stagnate and contract.”

The economy was stagnating because of the government’s interference in the labour market, making it expensive and difficult to employ people.

In his concluding remarks, De Klerk urged South Africans to be active and engage the ruling party on its policies, because they would shape the country’s future. – Sapa