Petrodollars quit world markets for first time in 18 years

Energy-exporting countries are set to pull their “petrodollars” out of world markets this year for the first time in almost two decades, according to a study by BNP Paribas.

Driven by this year’s drop in oil prices, the shift is likely to cause global market liquidity to fall, the study showed.

Brent crude futures have fallen 23 percent this year, with 2014 promising to be only the second year since 2002 that crude prices will end the year lower than they began it.

This decline follows years of windfalls for oil exporters such as Russia, Angola, Saudi Arabia and Nigeria. Much of that money found its way into financial markets, helping to boost asset prices and keep the cost of borrowing down, through so-called petrodollar recycling.

This year, however, the oil producers will effectively import capital amounting to $7.6 billion. By comparison, they exported $60 billion in 2013 and $248 billion in 2012, according to BNP Paribas calculations.

Petrodollar recycling peaked at $511 billion in 2006, BNP said.

“At its peak, about $500 billion a year was being recycled back into financial markets. This will be the first year in a long time that energy exporters will be sucking capital out,” said David Spegel, global head of emerging market sovereign and corporate Research at BNP.

In other words, oil exporters are now pulling liquidity out of financial markets rather than putting money in. That could result in higher borrowing costs for governments, companies, and ultimately, consumers as money becomes scarcer.

Spegel acknowledged that the net withdrawal was small. But he added: “What is interesting is they are draining rather than providing capital that is moving global liquidity. If oil prices fall further in coming years, energy producers will need more capital even if just to repay bonds.”

The reversal is largely down to Russia and the rest of the ex-Soviet Union, which BNP estimates have withdrawn $57 billion from world markets.

Russian companies have been shut out of global markets since Western countries imposed sanctions because of the conflict in Ukraine. Those companies are increasingly forced to rely on their own cash reserves or central bank funding to meet external debt repayments.

US blackmailing French banks says Putin

Vladimir Putin said that Russia was aware of pressure that the United States puts on France over the deal to build the Mistral warships for Russia and views it as blackmail, RIA reports. “What is being done now with the French banks causes nothing but outrage in Europe and in our country as well,” Putin said at a meeting with Russian ambassadors and permanent envoys.

“We are aware of the pressure that our American partners exert on France with a purpose of not to deliver the Mistral warships to Russia. And we know even that the United States hinted that if the French do not deliver the Mistrals, then sanctions will gradually be lifted from the banks, or at least be reduced to minimum. If this is not blackmail, then what is it?” he added.

His comments came after leading French bank BNP Paribas pleaded guilty Monday to US criminal charges of violating sanctions on Iran and Sudan for eight years and was fined a record $8.9 billion.

France’s largest bank BNP Paribas has sufficient funding to back the fine and penalties it needs to pay under settlements with US authorities over sanctions busting, the French bank’s top executives said on Tuesday.

“Our liquidity situation, we always guided it as being ample,” said Chief Financial Officer Lars Machenil, “At Q1 we had an overall excess of stable funding of 100 billion in euros out of which 50 billion was in US dollars. Yesterday when I looked into the systems…, that figure was basically unchanged at the end of the (second) quarter. This should allow having relevant cash for the settlement.”

The Financial Officer added that there was “no hurry” to seek the additional tier 1 funding that is seen as a key measure of bank stability as a result of having to pay the fine, set at almost $9 under a settlement announced late on Monday in the US.

Machenil also said that the bank plans to offer cash dividends for this year at 1.5 euro per share, the same as it was in 2013.

France’s largest bank becomes the seventh bank to settle a violations case. “Like other banks, BNP hid the names of Sudanese and Iranian clients when sending transactions coursing through its New York operations and the broader American financial system,” media report.

France’s BNP to pay US $9 bln for violating American sanctions
BNP Paribas has neared a deal with US prosecutors that would see the French bank pay $8 billion to $9 billion and accept other punitive measures for violating American sanctions, The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday.

It also demonstrates that in the increasingly more fragile alliance against Russia, more of Obama’s foreign policy partners are turning their backs on the US.

The WSJ reports “a group of 400 Russian sailors are scheduled to arrive on June 22 in the French Atlantic port of Saint-Nazaire to undergo months of instruction before some of them pilot the first of two Mistral-class carriers back to Russia in the fall, said one of these people.”

As the WSJ explains, the training is a pivotal step that deepens France’s commitment to fulfilling the €1.2 billion ($1.6 billion) contract to supply Russia with the carriers, which are built to launch amphibious attacks with landing craft, helicopters and tanks.

Calling off the Mistral contract, a French official said, would be akin to “shooting yourself in the foot,” forcing Paris to take the costly step of reimbursing Moscow.

France has already completed the first ship and built half of the second Mistral, which is scheduled for delivery in 2015. The second ship is named The Sevastopol after the Crimean port that serves as a headquarters for Russia’s Black Sea Fleet.

The Mistral is a potent weapon. The length of more than two football fields, the ship is designed to edge up to a shoreline and deploy more than a dozen tanks and attack helicopters as well as hundreds of troops.

The ship also plugs a crucial gap in Russia’s armed forces. Moscow boasts one of the world’s largest armies and a formidable air force. But Russia’s Black Sea fleet lacks an amphibious vessel like the Mistral, capable of launching a land invasion. That weakness deprived Moscow of a crucial knockout punch in 2008, when Russian troops invaded Georgia but never managed to dominate the former Soviet countries shoreline, forcing a stalemate.

“A ship like that would have allowed the Black Sea Fleet to accomplish its mission in 40 minutes,” Russian Navy Admiral Vladimir Vysotkiy said at the time.

The euro will remain the world’s favourite tradeable currency

With the rise of Bitcoin and general hostility towards so-called fiat currencies, notwithstanding the euroskeptic animosity towards the euro, many people are speculating about the ultimate demise of the euro. However, as French politician Marine Le Pen recently intimated to Der Spiegel, the euro is something of a German creation.

In essence, the euro represents a reincarnated Deutschemark, with bits of Dutch guilders and Belgian francs thrown in. Ever since French Finance Minister Pierre Bérégovoy decided to start fighting inflation in the German style during the 1980s, France also acquired a hard currency hitched to the Deutschemark, leading to the equation Germany + Benelux + France = one European currency. The French almost succeeded in smuggling a very old Gallic monetary unit, the écu, in as the ECU (European Currency Unit) but somehow the ploy did not succeed and today we know it as the euro, officially known to fx traders as the EUR. The public at large have got used to the symbol €.

And let’s not forget about Austria which also joined the monetary Anschluss with aplomb, ditching the Austrian schilling on 1 January 2002 when the euro started to circulate officially in the so-called eurozone.

Even if all the countries in Southern Europe had to go back to trading in their national currencies, the biggest part of the European Union, economically speaking, would still be using a unitary currency. The combined GDP of Germany, Austria, France and the Benelux countries is $7,75 trillion, whereas the total eurozone GDP equals $12,7 trillion. So we see that the original European currency club whose currencies first started to converge in the 1980s constitutes 61 percent of the eurozone’s GDP. If Italy is thrown in, it goes up to almost 77%. Italy has a large economy worth just over $2 trillion of annual GDP. During the dying days of the lira, Italy too started to seriously converge toward hard-currency status, similar to its transalpine neighbours. Parts of Northern Italy are really no different to Germany, with medium-sized businesses being heavily oriented towards exports of specialised machinery and consumer goods, including gold jewellery.

Talk in the British financial press of the “Club Med” countries who are out of sync with Germany and neighbours to the north-west is therefore of no real consequence, as any currency trader knows. Betting against the euro has been, for the most part, like going short the old Deutschemark or Swissie against the dollar, a long-term losing trade if ever there was one.

There are only two really liquid currencies in the world today: the dollar (USD) and the euro (EUR). Traders at the major currency banks like Citi, Deutsche, HSBC, JP MorganChase, UBS and others usually make a market in the EUR-USD pair in “half a yard”, i.e. half a billion euros that may be traded in a split second.

The recent hostility of the USA towards French and Swiss banks like BNP Paribas or Crédit Suisse has probably not been lost on Europeans in general. If ever the world had to go back to a dollar-only system, America could dictate terms (and gargantuan fines!) to everyone else.

So, love it or hate it, the euro is here to stay. If there had been another strong currency in the world, perhaps its future would have been less certain, but given long-term dollar weakness, it is the US currency that may unravel some day in the not too distant future. America has simply accumulated too many huge deficits, including budget and trade deficits, for the dollar not to depreciate over the long haul.

Probably the most stable currency in the world is the Swiss franc (CHF). However, despite Switzerland’s economic prowess and major role in banking, a country of 7 million people will never provide us with a global, tradeable currency.

The size of the global foreign exchange or FX market is $5,3 trillion per day. That is according to the Bank for International Settlements and the global results from the 2013 Triennial Central Bank Survey of Foreign Exchange and OTC Derivatives Markets Activity.

The EUR/USD (about 33% of all trade by volume) is the most actively traded currency pair by far, followed by the GBP/USD (13%) and USD/JPY (12%). Together these pairs alone account for 58% of all forex trade by volume. In their other possible combinations, EUR/GBP (4%), EUR/JPY 2%, GBP/JPY (1%), they account for about 65% of all forex trade.

Taken individually and looking at all the estimated trading volume of all the pairs these typically trade in, the USD is involved in over 71% of all forex trade, the EUR in about 41%, the GBP in about 18%, and the JPY about 16%.

We see then that the euro, while not having the privileged position of the dollar as a reserve currency, is nonetheless the only currency that may rival the dollar in the global currency market. If ever US military adventures in the world could turn a sizeable number of nations against it, the dollar could start to suffer as the preferred medium for oil and other commodity transactions. The only other currency that could remotely replace it as the world’s leading currency would be the euro.

Long-term dollar weakness driven US deficits represent the prime reasons why investors and foreign central banks may eventually lose their appetite for the greenback.

BNP Paribas fine: are $10 billion too much?

bnp-paribas2Forget the 70th anniversary of the Normandy landings and the elaborate preparations to celebrate later this week the liberation of France by its allies. Forget “Lafayette, nous sommes ici”, which General John Pershing is supposed to have said when the American Expeditionary Force showed up for what remained of the first world war, saluting the Frenchman who fought at George Washington’s side. Relations between France and America are bad and getting worse.

For that thank the whopping fine that American authorities are thought to be about to levy on BNP Paribas’s American arm for allegedly processing transactions with countries on America’s black list, such as Sudan and Iran. The precise amount of the fines, and the conditions attached to them, is still a matter of conjecture and probably negotiation. But whether or not the total fine tops $10 billion, as the Wall Street Journal reported possible last week, it will greatly exceed the €1.1 billion ($1.5 billion) that the bank said in February it had set aside to manage the sanctions-busting fall-out. Worse, it threatens to drive a coach and horses through its balance-sheet, just as the European Central Bank is about to assess eurozone banks’ robustness in an effort to flush out the bad news and boost bank lending to the “real” economy. BNP Paribas is France’s largest and Europe’s second-largest bank.

Unsurprisingly, the va et vient of top French financial figures crossing the Atlantic has been frenetic in recent weeks. Now the matter has become overtly political. Laurent Fabius, France’s foreign minister, did not hide his irritation when he said on France 2 television today that the fine was “unreasonable”. On Thursday evening the D-Day festivities will provide an opportunity for men with whom bucks are supposed to stop to speak about the matter face to face. Presidents Barack Obama and François Hollande are to have dinner together on Thursday, though other acrimonious subjects—France’s determination to carry on with defence sales to Russia, America’s still-remembered reluctance to intervene in Syria—will not be lacking.

Many in France, and probably elsewhere in Europe, are beginning to think that America lets its own banks off rather lightly (though JPMorgan Chase might disagree) and cracks down on foreign ones instead to appease voters’ visceral dislike of finance. American rules often differ from European ones (they do on sanctions), criminalising behaviour that would be legal in a bank’s home country. The Front National, for one, has publicly backed BNP Paribas, urging the government to “defend and protect the interests of millions of French depositors”. Such views are not confined to the far-right.

Calmer heads, Mr Fabius among them, agree that banks doing business in America should abide by American laws. But punishment for infringing them cannot be capricious: it should be roughly proportionate to the harm caused, plus an extra slug for deterrence.

The most handed over by any of the clutch of non-US banks already fined for sanctions-busting was HSBC’s $1.9 billion in 2012. BNP is looking at paying a fine several times that amount, as well as pleading guilty to a felony (as Crédit Suisse had to do when it paid a $2.6 billion fine in May for helping Americans escape US taxes) and losing, presumably temporarily, the ability to clear dollar transactions for its customers, which means losing the customers. Against all that the heads that will have to roll in New York and the official gumshoe sitting watchfully at the heart of the bank’s operations there are mere bagatelles. – The Economist

US bullies French bank BNP Paribas

bnpfranceFrance would defend the interests of bank BNP Paribas after the information appeared that it faced the prospect of over a $10 billion fine from the United States on charges of violating sanctions on Iran and Sudan, the country’s foreign ministry said, calling such sanctions “unreasonable.”

“If there is a an error or a violation then it’s normal that there is a fine, but the fine has to be proportionate and reasonable,” French foreign minister Laurent Fabius said on France 2 television. “These figures are not reasonable,” he said.

Currently, little is known about BNP Paribas’ negotiations with US authorities’ investigation whether it evaded sanctions related primarily to countries Iran, Syria, Sudan between 2002 and 2009.

US authorities declared that the BNP Paribas, which is the France’s biggest lender, stripped out identifying information from wire transfers so they could pass through the US financial system, Reuters reports.

Sources familiar with the negotiations said a settlement could include a fine of over $10 billion and other penalties, such as a possible temporary suspension of the bank’s authority to clear US dollar transactions.
Foreign minister Fabius said that US decision would raise questions over European Union-US trade negotiations given the agreement should be based on reciprocity.

“But here you would have an example of unfair and unilateral decision. It would be an extremely serious problem.”

Fabius’ comments come just two days before US President Barack Obama’s visit to France where he is going hold bilateral talks with his French counterpart Francois Hollande.

“These figures could have a negative impact and BNP could see its funds hit and that means less loans especially for French firms,” Fabius stated.

“It’s an extremely serious question that the Americans must handle in a spirit of partnership and not unilaterally,” he said.

Source: Voice of Russia