Demonstrators burn US flag at Soccer World Cup

The protesters in Natal shouted against “imperialism.”

Demonstrators burned a US flag near the stadium in northern Brazil where Vice President Joe Biden planned to attend the US soccer team’s opening World Cup match Monday evening.

The protesters in Natal shouted against “imperialism.” Security officers stopped them at a barricade about 2 kilometers (a mile) from the stadium’s gates.

Anti-World Cup demonstrations also took place in the southern city of Curitiba before a match between Iran and Nigeria.

After being repelled by police near that stadium, protesters regrouped downtown and used bricks and construction debris to smash windows of at least three banks. They also sprayed anti-World Cup slogans on city buses.

Mass protests against the World Cup erupted across Brazil last year and demonstrations have continued since the tournament began Thursday.

Obama announces sending US troops to Iraq

Tony Blair now tells the world that Western “inaction” in Syria has produced the Iraq crisis.

But since bombing Syria would have brought to power in Damascus the very Islamists who are now threatening Baghdad, it must therefore be only a mad person who considers his views.

President Obama certainly did not wince. He announced on Monday that US ground troops ‘equipped for combat’ are being sent to Iraq – just days after claiming that no American soldiers would be deployed to the war-ravaged country.

In a letter to Congress, the president said American troops will be returning to Iraq only three years after they left and their deployment began on Sunday.

The president told Congress that American military personnel in Baghdad will be ‘equipped for combat.’

It is instructive to contemplate what Blair’s rebel friends in Syria are up to.

Assad’s enemies are the same Nusra and al-Qaida fighters whom Blair’s bombing of Damascus would have helped and who now threaten Iraq’s existence.

Not to mention the recent attacks in Kenia.

Televangelist Pat Robertson on Monday blasted former President George W. Bush for selling Americans the Iraq invasion, which led to the violence that is currently sweeping across the country.

During his Monday broadcast, a viewer asked Robertson if there was a solution to the ongoing violence caused by an al Qaeda splinter group, ISIS, threatening to take over Iraq.

“Right now, what we did — and it was a great mistake to go in there,” Robertson explained, pointing out that Saddam Hussein’s “bomb maker” had said that the then-dictator “doesn’t know how to make an atomic bomb.”

And so to sell the American people on weapons of mass destruction, he had WMD and was getting [concentrated uranium] yellowcake out of Africa and all of that, it was a lot of nonsense,” the TV preacher said. “We were sold a bill of goods, we should never have gone into that country!”

“As bad as Saddam Hussein was, he held those warring factions in check, and he contained those radical Islamists,” he continued. “Fix it, no? It’s too late to fix it. It’s unfixable. Those simmering animosities have been there for centuries.”

Most people outside the US knew this before the ill-fated invasion.

The sudden implosion of the vast Iraqi Army of the Baghdad Puppet Regime constructed by the US is a timely warning of the fates of the other puppet states in the Muslim World: Afghanistan, Egypt, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, UAE and lesser ones.

The whole Muslim World of one and a half billion people have turned overwhelmingly against the US and support guerrilla groups against the US.

Pakistan, a huge nuclear state with about 150 millon people quickly went from pro-US to fiercely anti-US over the annihilation of Afghanistan and the systematic drone attacks on Pakistani civilians.

Clearly American politicians understand money and funding, but have no grasp on geography or identity.

 

‘Ukraine will hurt its own economy’, says Gazprom head

Gazprom considers Ukraine’s position a form of blackmail and a method to negotiate an ultra-low price, Aleksey Miller, head of Russia’s Gazprom, said on Monday.

“These absurd and unreasonable actions will ultimately hurt the Ukrainian economy, but after the Minister of Foreign Affairs comment last week, I am surprised by very little,” Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said after holding talks with Gazprom head Aleksey Miller and Russia’s Energy Minister Aleksandr Novak.

“Russia is ready to continue gas talks with Ukraine, but only on the condition of debt repayment,” Medvedev said at the meeting, noting Ukraine’s outstanding debt of $4.5 billion.

On Monday Gazprom introduced a prepayment system for Ukraine, who is months behind on its gas bills, and in the future will only get natural gas it pays for in advance.

Russia has offered Ukraine a final gas price of $385 per 1,000 cubic meters, but Ukraine has requested an interim price of $326, which was suggested by the EU.

“The terms offered to Kiev on gas were better than those that were given to the Yanukovich government,” Miller said. Under Yanukovich’s tenure, Ukraine scored a major discount and imported natural gas for $268.50 per 1,000 cubic meters, which was cancelled after his overthrow and the establishment of a coup-appointed government in Kiev.

“The system for prepaid gas is the result of the Ukrainian government’s unconstructive stance,” Gazprom head added.

Ukraine’s energy minister Yuriy Prodan in turn has confirmed that gas supplies from Moscow to Kiev have been reduced to zero, but insists that deliveries to Europe are safe.

Only 185 million cubic meters of natural gas per day will be transported through Ukraine to European markets, Prodan said.

Ukraine has more than 14 billion cubic meters of gas in underground storage, enough to meet its needs until December, the chief executive of state gas company Naftogaz said on Monday.

Prodan’s comments echo the earlier statements from Gazprom’s spokesperson, who said that as of Monday, Naftogaz, Ukraine’s state-owned gas and oil company, will receive gas only for which prepayment has been made, and since it has paid for nothing, it will receive nothing.

“Volumes of gas for European customers will be fully met in compliance with their contracts. Naftogaz must ensure transportation to the delivery points,” Kupriyanov said earlier. – RT.COM

Biden tells Germans they are xenophobic

Before remarking on Germany’s xenophobia, Joe Biden said the US needed to invest further in a skilled workforce and infrastructure.

US Vice President Joe Biden undoubtedly ruffled some feathers in Germany on Tuesday when he suggested the country was “xenophobic” and much less accommodating to immigrants compared to the United States.

Speaking at an event held by the National Association of Manufacturers in Washington, DC, Biden gave a speech in which he described three things the United States needs to do to “keep our edge” in the global economy. One of these priorities is passing comprehensive immigration reform, but the way Biden chose to frame the issue has made headlines and raised plenty of eyebrows.

“We have to pass an immigration bill,” Biden said, as quoted by the Washington Examiner, which also obtained a recording of the segment. “Look at Germany, look at the rest of the world. We’re the only non-xenophobic nation in the world that’s a major economy.”

In a tweet by Detroit News DC Bureau Chief David Shepardson, the journalist said Biden went even further than that and added other countries in the mix, claiming that Germany, Japan, and China are all “not nearly as welcoming of immigrants” as the US.

Biden reportedly did not expand on his analysis, leaving many to question just how truthful it was. As noted by the German edition of The Local, the notion that Germany is hostile to immigrants doesn’t fit in with the facts inside Europe’s largest economy.

According to a May report by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Germany has experienced a “boom” in immigration over the last few years, leapfrogging Canada and the United Kingdom to take second place as a top destination for migrants around the world, behind only the US. The OECD stated that between 2009 and 2012, permanent migration rose 38 percent as Germany moved up from eight place.

“Such a strong increase from one year to another has been rarely observed in any major OECD country,” Thomas Liebig, one of the study’s authors, said to Bloomberg. “We can clearly speak about a boom of migration to Germany without exaggeration.”

Meanwhile, The Local noted that new data from Germany’s Federal Statistics Office show more than 15.3 million people out of the country’s 81 million-strong population have a migrant background.

Before remarking on Germany’s xenophobia, Biden said the US needed to invest further in a skilled workforce and infrastructure, bemoaning the current lack of consensus on the issue.

“We have to invest in infrastructure,” he said. “That used to be an overwhelming bipartisan consensus in the united states of America. For the past 150 years it’s been a consensus; not at the moment.”

Notorious for making controversial statements or gaffes, Biden’s comments regarding Germany aren’t the first time he’s been scrutinized. The vice president made waves in the past for being caught on a hot mic telling President Obama the Affordable Care Act is a “big f**king deal,” announcing his support for gay marriage before the president himself, and making questionable comments like telling a politician in a wheelchair to stand up for an applause. – RT.COM

Gauteng might reconsider e-tolls

Moves are afoot to possibly scrap the use of e-tolls to fund the cost of building highways in the province in the future.

And although the idea has not yet been completely canned, initial indications are that the Gauteng government has heeded the dissatisfaction of motorists.

Gauteng Transport MEC Ismail Vadi told The Sunday Independent this week that they were taking a “second look at the matter”.

“We have had long discussions in the ANC Gauteng and in government. Phase one is done and we are working towards settling the debt. There is still dissatisfaction with the funding model. We are taking a second look at the matter,” said Vadi.

Just over 35 percent of road users who drive through gantries are paying their bills.

According to Transport Minister Dipuo Peters, less than 10 percent of the R543 million invoice that was transferred to the SA National Roads Agency Limited’s violations processing centre was recovered.

Vadi said that while there was a need to expand and upgrade our road infrastructure and expand our road network “for future infrastructure funding, we are looking at what our other options are”.

“E-tolls still remain a valid option but there are also discussions about a provincial fuel levy or a provincial tax or shadow tolling.”

He said the government would not scrap the e-tolls as it still considers them an important infrastructure.

Vadi’s statements come as Sanral’s publicised figures of having sold 1.2 million tags are undergoing independent auditing.

“There will be no review of phase one of the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project. Those are fantastic highways which have done wonders in easing traffic congestion but for phase two we will look at our options.”

Vadi is the only MEC who was retained in the same portfolio.

It means that things such as the Integrated Transport Master Plan 25 (ITMP25) – one of the brainchildren of his last term as transport MEC – are still on the table.

The ITMP25 is an ambitious 25-year transport plan which proposes a redesign in the public transport system.

In this plan rail will become the most important form of public transport in the long term, followed by the BRT system, then secondary buses and taxis within the municipalities.

“It was formally approved as the policy document of the Department of Transport and now the plan is to break down the 25-year plan into five-year workable units to look at what we focus on in this administration,” said Vadi.

His immediate game changer, as he calls it, is to get public transport on a better footing.

In Joburg the first two phases of the Rea Vaya have already been rolled out. Tshwane is in the construction phase of its A Re Yeng bus system while Ekurhuleni is still lagging behind and has just launched its project.

The first real roll-out in Ekurhuleni will only be evident in 18 to 24 months, said Vadi.

“It is a vast BRT network and it will give us a great footprint in public transport.”

He said the department had learnt many lessons from the first bus rapid transport system in Joburg, which experienced several delays.

One of the most important was that effort must be made to get a buy-in from the taxi and bus industries as there is a better chance to avoid conflict.

“The second phase launched with no problems and the indications are that up to 30 000 people are using the system, said Vadi.

Negotiations are under way on the next phase, 1C – Joburg Sandton, Alex – a route that has been plagued by taxi-related violence for many years.

Vadi is in no way oblivious to the violence that has gripped the industry but he believes there should be significant change in the way the taxi industry operates.

“They provide a vital service – 55 percent of commuters use the taxi industry. It may have been higher in the past but there is a declining ridership. They need to consider their business model.

“They need to professionalise and operate on scheduled times and shorter distances. We see a growing but more structured role for them,” he said.

The Metrorail network is outdated and suffers from many problems said Vadi, including cable theft.

There was also the future expansion of the Gautrain by a east-west line.

“The department is currently busy with a pre-feasibility study. Once that is approved, the funding will need to be secured. We are hoping to get this in this administration,” said Vadi.

Like the first Gautrain project, it will take 10 years to complete.

But Vadi pointed out that it was not a given that the train would be a Gautrain.

“The feasibility study may establish that a medium-speed train like the Gautrain is not needed and what is needed is a light-speed train. But the feasibility study will reveal that. The outcome is expected in the next 12 months.”

The good news for Gautrain users is that service hours are being extended – from 5am to 9pm and although fares during peak hours are on the increase, passengers using the train during off peak hours will see their fares reduced by 30 percent. – Excerpted from the Sunday Independent

Death toll in Kenyan attack rises to 48

The death toll in an attack by gunmen on the Kenyan coastal town of Mpeketoni rose to at least 48 people, the Kenya Red Cross and police said on Monday.

The death toll in an attack by gunmen on the Kenyan coastal town of Mpeketoni rose to at least 48 people, the Kenya Red Cross and police said on Monday.

Militants targeted two hotels, a bank and a police station with guns and at least one explosive device. The assault on Sunday night was the latest in a string of attacks that have hurt Kenya’s tourism business, a key source of foreign exchange.

Mpeketoni lies north of Kenya’s main port of Mombasa. – Reuters

Two hijackers die in shootout with KZN police

On Thursday, 12 June 2014 members of the K9 Unit and Sydenham Police Station arrested three suspects aged between 18 and 20 for attempted murder, hijacking and possession of unlicensed firearms and ammunition. It is alleged that the female victim was earlier hijacked of her grey Volvo motor vehicle. She was accosted by two suspects at gunpoint whilst seated in her car. They instructed her to move over and the suspect drove off with her in the vehicle. She was dropped off at Pineside Road in Pinetown and the suspects drove towards Clermont.

At about 20:00 police spotted the said hijacked vehicle at Roger Sishi Road in New Germany. The police officers activated their blue lights and ordered the suspects to stop. The suspects fired shots towards the police who returned fire. The suspects continued to flee until the driver of the hijacked vehicle allegedly lost control of the vehicle and crashed into a wall. Three suspects managed to flee on foot into the nearby bushes and were later arrested. Two other suspects were fatally wounded during the shootout. Two firearms were seized and will be sent for ballistics tests to ascertain if they were used in any other crime in the country. The arrested suspects will appear in the Pinetown Magistrates Court soon on charges of attempted murder, hijacking and possession of unlicensed firearms and ammunition.

The KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Commissioner, Lieutenant General Mmamonnye Ngobeni commended the members for the good work that led to the recovering of the hijacked vehicle and the arrest the suspects. “We would like to warn criminals that the police will not hesitate to retaliate when their lives are in danger. It is a common trend that police officers in this province are confronted with gunfire on a daily basis when they attempt to arrest criminals. We are fortunate that none of our police officers have become statistics especially over the past few weeks,” she said. – SA Police Media Service

Why I hate South Africa, part 1

by Dan Roodt

Like Dan Roodt’s Facebook page

South Africa is a land of great natural beauty. Its unique flora and fauna attract tourists from all over the world. Due to geological accident, we also have buried beneath our soil and rock the biggest or second biggest mineral bonanza of all time, including 80% of the world’s platinum. Since 1886 when gold was discovered, various fortunes have been made in mining those mineral deposits.

The weather, at least where I live in the north of Johannesburg, is more than ideal; it is perfect. We have three hundred days of sunshine per year or thereabouts and it is never too hot or too cold. Visitors from the northern hemisphere mistake our winters for summer as midday temperatures go above twenty Centigrade.

When the Voortrekkers, our nineteenth-century pioneers crossed the Drakensberg in their ox-wagons and arrived in the Transvaal, they stumbled upon a pristine land of sunshine, savannah and plentiful game, a true paradise.

South Africa could have been utopia, if it had not been for her people. Even using such a possessive pronoun in the feminine gender implies some kind of connection between the land and its inhabitants, if not patriotism. Now, patriotism and a sense of belonging would be the last thing the average interloper strutting and stomping about this fair land could be suspected of. Rather, he or she regards this bountiful place as the forty thieves did the cave of Ali Baba, simply a source of loot!

The turning point in South African history came in the nineteenth century when the gold rush drew like a magnet a horde of crazed would-be capitalists and criminals to these shores. For a few decades during the twentieth century we had managed to staunch the mayhem, the cold, unscrupulous greed venting itself upon us. Alas, for a variety of reasons – not least the utter cowardice and stupidity of the former Afrikaner leadership – that time of growth and hope for the future is long past. All that we may look forward to is more decadent dissolution, more crime and venality that will rage unabatedly. It is as if the land itself has been wounded, stung and, like a predator sensing its own demise, lashes out at every living being within the arc of its claws and fangs.

The floodgates of hell have been opened, in the name of “democracy”, that exalted term. It has become, in our context, comical, ironic and even absurd. It reminds me of the GDR, the German “Democratic” Republic which was equally lacking in real democracy. But let me not insult that erstwhile “farmers’ and workers’ state”, the GDR, by comparing contemporary South Africa to it. At least in the GDR there were still some principles held by a few people, communists at that, whereas South Africa has descended to the level of delinquent insouciance in which values or principles only exist to be mocked or sneered at.

Normally I would write these words in our noble local language, Afrikaans, which washed up on the shores of the Cape from Northern Europe. A spoken language, a patois of Dutch and Low German, we have lovingly preserved and standardised it to become one of the world’s great cultural languages. Yet, in recent times and under the influence of the ambient nihilism of South Africa, many of our people have discarded this age-old tongue, full of mysterious words and expressions that formed that “bridge between Europe and Africa” that NP van Wyk Louw, perhaps our greatest poet, spoke of.

South Africa has become a dump in every sense of the word. And I say that not only because garbage or litter is literally strewn all over, but because its inhabitants have no real sense of value. Money is proverbially “easy”, obtained through corruption or simple robbery and theft. So like all parvenus the “South Africans” do not know what it means to save, invest or work for money. However, in a more fundamental sense, things of great value – cultural, historical, linguistic, architectural, artistic – are simply thrown away, dumped. Some of our greatest buildings, monuments to a past of taste and a strong national identity, have been demolished without so much as a second thought.

Afrikaans too, has been dumped, with everything else, including by many Afrikaners who have become caught up in the general decay, the loss of societal moorings that have come to characterise this entity which we still mistakenly call a “republic”. To say that I feel alienated from South Africa represents an understatement. However, I feel almost equally alienated from my fellow Afrikaners, these new, obsequious, treacherous and venal people who are but a pale shadow of their patriotic and pioneering forebears. Apart from a tiny minority of proud and civilised Afrikaners who still honour their culture, language and traditions, the rest have become almost mimic men in the sense given to that term by V.S. Naipaul, a second-hand, quasi-British people and as rootless as the illegal African immigrants that wander over our borders on a daily basis.

Perhaps predictably, the Afrikaner has become ashamed of himself. Taunted and vilified by the invective and propaganda of his enemies, he has lacked the courage and the intelligence to respond in any meaningful way. The abjectness of the Afrikaner’s spiritual surrender is painful to behold. That is why this text would be simply lost on the vast majority of Afrikaners, milling about in their confusion, self-doubt and self-hatred. The glib clichés of their journalists and pundits, imitating American-liberal or politically correct discourse, are quite beyond any form of serious discussion or reflection. Like Captain Ahab confronting Moby Dick, I have to face up to this monstrous entity with the bland geographical name, South Africa, casting this message appositely to sea like a message in a bottle that might be read somewhere on the other side of the globe, or not read at all.

Apparently the first Roodt came to South Africa in the early 1700s, so despite what Afrocentric blacks proclaim to the contrary, that “Africa belongs to the Africans”, I may consider myself to some extent naturalised. I hold no other passport. Yet I am also very aware of the murderous xenophobia at the heart of contemporary South Africa which holds that both the white man and the foreign African are unwanted, “foreign”, fit only to be expelled or to be killed.

Like any sensible person of European descent has to admit, South Africa hates us. We are despised for many reasons, some more atavistic and preposterous than others, but in no other country has pure, unadulterated ethnic hatred been so mythologised and so obfuscated by largely spurious interpretations of history as here. Lest I be accused of lapsing into the commonplace black-white rhetoric representing analysis or thinking in South Africa, I am accutely aware that much of what passes for racial feeling in South Africa has always been stirred up from outside or been a handy way for the oligarchy currently looting us to justify its domination and ludicrously discriminatory policies, however much they may be clothed in US-style, politically correct jargon.

Sooner or later, one has to confront the salient fact: South Africa, or the gathering mob on the way to another necklace killing, that symbol of “liberation”, hates me. In turn, and increasingly so, I have come to hate South Africa. With a passion.

I may still love boerewors and biltong, and soaking up the winter sun through my window, but I have only contempt for this failed-state-in-the-making, this pseudo-democracy, this Little England, Little America and everything little, belittling and petty that one may imagine.

South Africa has no reason for existing. It is not the name of a country, but of a pathology. It possesses no identity to speak of. It is just a big parasite preying on the labours of the few who are still, against all odds, pursuing a normal existence under the Southern Cross.

I think I could write a book about why I hate South Africa. However, immediately I have to concede that writing books in South Africa is generally a waste of time. The few people who are still able to read, after umpteen educational experiments, the advent of cellphones and the ambient degeneracy, do not constitute a market for books. There is no literary society. Like everything else in South Africa, the book industry is controlled by a few colonial souls who make money out of importing British books. What is known as the local book, especially the so-called non-fiction book, is merely the endless repetition of baseless clichés and idées reçues. Otherwise there are various talking heads from radio and TV who somehow think that they should also bestow upon themselves the imprimatur of “author” by having their usual vacuous sayings coagulated into print.

The notion of “debate” and especially a debate by means of an argument that might span two or three hundred pages of a book, is so foreign to South Africa that it would make me even more of an outsider than I already am if I had to attempt anything like it. It would appear to be some foreign activity, like playing pétanque on a rugby field.

It remains therefore for me to sum up the very good and multifarious reasons why I hate South Africa.

(To be continued)

Donate or subscribe to praag!

Raping an organization

theron_johann2

by Johann Theron

South Africa may be the rape capital of the world, for not only personal rapes of men, women and children, but also for organizational rapes. This article is not however, about individual/personal rape cases but of organizational rape, although pretty much the same conditions and effects apply – such as the requirement to say NO. The difference is that while everybody in the world seems to abhor the act of rape, the act of raping an organization seems to be fair play. A simple example is the South African constitution where individual protection against rape is promised, while the rape of Afrikaner institutions is seen as fair discrimination.

It is also not about the West raping the earth with carbon dioxide or the popular intelligence rape someone like Angela Merkel may have experienced as per Edward Snowden.

This article is not about a political party such as hypothetically the ANC raping its own country/continent or the big money powers such as hypothetically Goldman Sachs raping a country such as South Africa (for gold), or the Ukraine (to get at Russia), but it is at a lower level of organizations affecting people in communities. The assumption is that raping such organizations would effectively rape and tear a community apart, resulting in effectively a traumatized society. Where a personal rape affects one person or family, organizational rape which can be caused by one person, affects thousands of people.

Initial thoughts of prospective organizations at the community level are companies like Woolworths or Shell. For the most part these companies are modelled on Walmart that actually provides cost-effective goods even to rural areas and they are also represented in industry institutions that interface with governments, providing some form of quality and governance. That they provide unnecessary goods pushing the consumerist envelope is another topic.

Another possibility is financial institutions where the rape verdict becomes slightly warmer because of the long-term effect of inflation that banks may capitalize on or the insurance companies that may make more money out of the constant premium stream than their subscribers do. It is true that in countries where financial community co-ops are used, inhabitants get more value, but having that option and not exercising it prevents inhabitants from crying rape from centralized banks. However, some actually already do that in South Africa.

Another possibility is communications companies with cell towers everywhere. They appear to control the municipalities where no limit is set on the maximum number of cell towers per area. This is clearly a shortage of intellectual capacity and although radio waves have medical effects on humans, it is not yet seen as rape, unless a price such as unreasonable cost/minute contributes to this distress. The positive effect of improved productivity for communities, if harnessed, should also come into play where some communities such as Irene (close to Pretoria) or Sandhurst (close to Johannesburg) are examples.

One type of business that ratchets the possibility of rape up a notch or two are land developers. Their spreadsheets dictate what they do and customer cashflow (towards their own pockets) determines how fast they do it. Without proper town planning or architectural design, they deliver houses that were planned around the cheapest materials they can get instead of aiming for the South African ideal, as derived from 300 hundred years of building experience. One could say that surely the house prices are cheap due to cheap materials applied, the question is, were quality standards actually applied such as damp proofing or proper cement mixes? In my own case – not – so I feel used, cheated, etc.

But the latest contender to the best organizational rapist crown appears to be the Church. One overt example is the new Pope Francis appointing McKinsey to fix the Vatican Bank’s corruption – how much corruption we will never know but if it is at the same scale as Pastoral “rape” of young boys, then it probably becomes unbearable.

A covert example is the South African Dutch Reformed Church, facing a substantial loss of members across the country after 1994. A lot of qualified pastors or dominees lost their jobs and the drop in pension affected many more. Universities are doing away with Afrikaans-language training which means that the Church may on its own decide to move its entire congregations to the English version in some secret future time schedule – as Doxa Deo is doing. Apart from that, the actuary of the Church is probably doing fine adjustments and long-term planning to protect the dominees currently employed. What this amounts to is that as individual congregation turnover gradually drops at say 5% per year, the incumbent dominee’s salary increases by 5%. Let’s say that a general guideline is that salaries are 50% of turnover, then the guideline may change to 55% the next year. However, to lessen the visible effect of this on congregational spreadsheets, the dominee will be quite happy to only increase his pensionable salary and nobody will be the wiser. All this happens while the congregational turnover drops and by the time it drops to R900 000, the salary percentage might be 80%, with a pensionable portion 200% more than originally contracted. The insidious effect is that the dominee will, without really knowing it, manage the turnover downwards in order to get more benefit. The congregation will also not realize it, but once the turnover drops below R900 000, the church may be sold or handed to the Synod. From past examples, selling a Church is an emotional issue and has a heart-wrenching effect on people. Especially if they do not understand how they got there in the first place.

The devastating effect on communities is psychological and heart-wrenching because theologically, the structure of congregations over the world forms a body, aptly called the “Body of Christ” and when that gets raped, serious outfall will be the order of the day.

This comparative description of the raping of organizations can also be found in literature. For example a book by Howard F Stein: Nothing personal, just business – A guided journey into organizational darkness. While it generally describes commercial organizations, there are a few cases of non-profit organizations from which comparisons can be drawn. Essentially it describes the psychoanalytic effect of thoughts inducing a physical outcome. Where a positive example is happiness resulting in the clapping of hands, a negative example is defensive thoughts resulting in self-enriching by crippling the client. In both cases though, the person does not really know that he/she is doing it.

Assault riffle and 332 rounds of ammunition seized in KZN

R5 assault rifle
R5 assault rifle

A 37-year-old woman and her 20-year-old son were arrested at their homestead in Mistake Farm close to Umzinto on Monday afternoon, 9 June, for being in possession of, inter alia, firearms and ammunition. They are due to appear in the Umzinto Magistrates Court on Wednesday, 11 June. Police seized an R5 rifle with three magazines, a 9mm Norinco pistol loaded with nine live rounds of ammunition, two bullet proof vests, two police reflective jackets, a crime scene expert jacket, a can of teargas, a can of photographic spray, a miner’s headlamp, a pair of handcuffs, 38 shotgun rounds and 285 R5 rounds of ammunition.

Umzinto SAPS Detective Service Team gathered intelligence regarding a firearm that had been used in an attempted murder case that they were investigating and raided the suspects’ homestead. A search of the rondavel occupied by the son resulted in police finding the shotgun ammunition and the police equipment. Thereafter, police carried out a search of the main house which is occupied by his parents and they discovered a hole in the concrete floor of the bedroom beneath the bed. It was boarded up to conceal the 285 live rounds of R5 ammunition. A search in a disused deep freezer standing alongside the passage wall yielded the R5 rifle with three magazines and the Norinco pistol which was loaded with nine rounds of ammunition. The serial numbers of both guns had been ground off.

The mother was placed under arrest and on their way out, the detectives found the son in a taxi and placed him under arrest as well. On Tuesday morning, the arrested woman’s husband, who is in his forties, handed himself over to the Umzinto police. He will also be appearing in court with his wife and son. Meanwhile, investigations revealed that the police equipment, other than the firearms and ammunition, may have been stolen from a SAPS police vehicle that had been broken into in 2012 in Durban. Police officers from Pretoria were in Durban on official police duty when their state vehicle was broken into and the equipment stolen. The firearms will be forwarded to the SAPS Forensic department for ballistics tests to determine if they had been used to commit any other offences.

The Provincial Commissioner of KwaZulu-Natal, Lieutenant General Mmamonnye Ngobeni commended the members for the investigation that led to the recovery of the firearms and equipment. “We will be investigating if these firearms were used by these suspects to commit any other crimes and if so, further charges will be added,” she said. – SA Police Media Service

Israel no ‘oasis of human rights and equality’

Onlangse betoging in Johannesburg teen 'Apartheid-Israel'
Recent protest in Johannesburg against ‘Apartheid-Israel’ with photo of Mandela and Arafat

by Salomé Oosthuizen, Helderkruin, Johannesburg

The letter below was sent to Business Day newspaper in response to a letter to the same newspaper written by a Ms. Shapiro of Glenhazel, Johannesburg about Israel. In her letter she says, inter alia, that Israel is “a miracle that is a rebirth” and that the country is where “black and white walk hand in hand on the streets”. She also says the country is “an oasis of human rights and human equality amidst a sea of oppression and brutality”. Her letter gives the impression that Arabs and Jews are treated equally in Israel and that Arabs are laughing and singing and are “picnicking on the grass outside her apartment”. But let me first quote her letter in full:

FAADELAH Patel queries the definition of a Jewish state (Hamas has changed, Letters, May 12).

I have spent the past two weeks in Israel so will try to explain to her just what a Jewish state is. It is the state where Jews walk their streets proudly, celebrating the miracle that is the rebirth of their country.

It is the state where every Jew stands at attention for two minutes while the sirens drone on Yom Hashoah (the day commemorating the wilful slaughter of 6-million Jewish men, women and children during the Holocaust).

It is the state where every citizen stands at attention for two minutes while sirens drone on Yom Hazikaron (the day commemorating the loss of Israeli life, Arab and Jew, both on the battlefield and as a result of terrorism). It is the state where businesses close on the Shabbat, the Jewish Sabbath, and it’s the state where religious Jews do not need to search for kosher restaurants.

But it is also much else, and herein lies the true miracle of what Israel is.

It is the state where my family and I encountered a group of Arabs celebrating a birthday, laughing, singing and dancing on a boat ride on Lake Kinneret. We were the only Jews on this trip. It is the state where, when alighting from the boat, and going into a kosher restaurant in the harbour, we were followed by many of the self-same Arabs who had shared the boat ride with us.

It is the state where the lady in the queue in front of me in the clothing shop was an Arab dressed in a burqa, buying clothes for her grandchildren, as was I. It is the state where Arabs picnic on the grass outside my apartment.

It is the state where the pharmacist on my corner is an Arab woman, and black and white walk hand in hand on the streets.

And it is the state where Jew, Muslim and Christian worship freely and without fear the G-d of their choice.

And so Ms Patel, while Israel is and will remain the state of the Jewish people, it will always, because of, not in spite of, its Jewish character, be an oasis of human rights and human equality amidst a sea of oppression and brutality.

Monessa Shapiro
Glenhazel

Following is the letter I wrote to Business Day in response to this fairy tale. My letter was not printed by Business Day. My letter was based on verifiable facts, Ms. Shapiro’s letter was based on her rose-tinted impressions after a two week visit. What can we make of this omission? Why would the truth be hidden by Business Day while a glossy, fanciful story is printed as the truth about Israel?

We leave the reasons for this to the imagination of our friends and contacts. Please send this to your friends to show how the so-called press freedom of South Africa really operates. After all, my letter was based on facts from international newspapers, including the Israeli press. Why would Business Day want to hide the truth?

Dear Sir,

I refer to your correspondent’s letter “Defining a Jewish State” (BD 15 May) where a rose-tinted narrative attempts to explain to us how pleasant life is in Israel, and how well everyone – Jew and Arab, black and white – get along with each other. The letter is so far removed from reality that it is incumbent on anyone who knows history to rebut this fanciful tale.

“Black and white walk hand in hand on the streets” says your correspondent. Perhaps she saw an instance of this, but it certainly does not represent the true picture of race relations in Israel. On May 29 2012, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he was adding African “infiltrators” to his list of threats to the Jewish homeland. He said he would build the world’s biggest detention centre and deport all those within, starting with the south Sudanese. (The Economist, June 2, 2012)

Demonstrators attacked African migrants in Tel Aviv in protest against refugees and asylum-seekers, indicating an increasingly volatile mood in Israel against blacks. (The Guardian 24.5.12) Miri Regev a member of the Israeli Parliament told an angry Israeli crowd that “the Sudanese are a cancer in our body”. A car containing Africans was attacked and shops serving the refugee community were looted. “African infiltrators are threatening the identity of the Jewish state”, said the prime minister. (The Guardian 20.5.12) “Israel belongs to the white man” declared Israeli Interior Minister Eli Yishai. (Haaretz newspaper 3.6.12). Israel introduced a law to detain illegal immigrants for up to 3 years, according to Haaretz.

Despite the happy hand-holding, Israel remains a racially-sensitive country. In an announcement from the Prime Minister’s office at the end of July 2013, Israel said it plans to introduce DNA testing to ensure that no non-Jews from Russia enter the country. (The Times of Israel, 29.7.13). In addition, in order to get married in Israel, applicants have to prove their Jewishness and this is done by DNA testing, Rabbi Naftali Schreiber told Haaretz (11 July 2013). This is the extent of the checks undertaken by the Jewish state to make sure that no Gentiles are allowed to marry Jews in their country.

Your correspondent says Israel is a miracle rebirth, but clearly prefers to ignore the ethnic cleansing that occurred when Israel drove thousands of Palestinians from their homes in 1948 and afterwards, and that millions of these refugees still languish in camps throughout the Arab world. This is a fact of history. If Israelis believe it’s their “divine right” to occupy Israel, then do other nations not have divine rights or even civil rights? Israel snubs its nose at the world. Despite repeated international condemnation, including a UN General Assembly resolution and a ruling by the International Court of Justice, the population of Israel’s illegal settlements (on Palestinian territory) has grown by an average of 5% annually since 2001. That compares to an average growth of just 1,8% for the population of Israeli proper. Israel refuses to dismantle these settlements.

Israel has broken or ignored more UN resolutions than any other country in UN history. It is in violation of at least 102 of these resolutions, mainly to do with invasions of neighboring countries and the dispossession of the Palestinians.

Your correspondent says she saw many “happy Arabs, laughing and having picnics on the grass outside her apartment”. This could be because Israel’s largest theme park segregates Arabs and Jews. A posting on the Arab Israeli Balad party Facebook page reveals that Arab Israelis and Jews do not share the park on the same day. Schools are the same. Haaretz newspaper refers to this phenomenon in an article entitled “Schools for Jews and Arabs : separate but definitely not equal” as “plain segregation” in the school system. (Haaretz 25.6.12). In Jerusalem there is a separate “ditch” between Jewish and Arab neighborhoods (Haaretz 13.9.13). State-built housing complexes are routinely reserved for Jews only. (Financial Times 1.5.12)

It is ironic that those whites in the forefront of the struggle against apartheid in South Africa were overwhelmingly Jewish. Joe Slovo is credited with writing the Freedom Charter. What’s good for the goose is obviously not good for the gander. Israel is certainly not an “oasis of human rights and human equality” as your correspondent states. A cursory glance at the website of any Israeli newspaper will put paid to that mirage.

Salomé Oosthuizen, Helderkruin

Bawbawa’s journalistic porn

mercer_ilanaby Ilana Mercer

[followbutton username=’IlanaMercer’ count=’true’ lang=’en’ theme=’light’]

Like Ilana Mercer’s Facebook page

Barbara Walters has promised to retire. But then so did that lip-licking lizard, Larry King. You can’t take them at their word.

In my journalism school days, one looked up to the legendary, late Oriana Fallaci. These days, it’s mediocrities like Walters and colorectal crusader Katie Couric who’re considered cutting-edge clever. And they’ve sired a new crop of talking coifs.

Although they’re walking clichés – and there’s little they can say that’ll edify or enlighten – the likes of Brook Baldwin and Erin Burnett of CNN are regularly invited to deliver commencement addresses to university graduates! “Remember, it’s not about you,” Baldwin lectured students at her journalism and communications school alma mater. Yet journalistic evenhandedness regularly tips into self-serving advocacy under the direction of this feminist front-woman. “As a woman, I get frustrated, protested, as she browbeat a British reporter for daring to criticize Kate Middleton’s barely there underwear.

Into the Cannibal's Pot

Coming as she did from a background in “women’s interest stories,” it was only natural for Walters to bring the same one-dimensional perspective to “The View,” a roundtable dominated by women and aimed at the same demographic. “The View” was “charitably” punctured by the occasional “Guy Day Friday.” So successful was Barbara’s formula, that it has been copied by Fox News (where, with exceptions like Gerri Willis, Elizabeth MacDonald, Melissa Francis and Kennedy of the Business channel – the babes are not much better). “Outnumbered” (but not outfoxed) is “The View,” but with a better view of legs and cleavage. Views voiced by the self-congratulatory cyphers in short skirts on the GOP network, however, are just as formulaic as Barbara’s Democrat-friendly debates.

Another of Barbara’s brainchildren was the much-anticipated, annual “Most Fascinating People List,” for which she redefined the concept of “fascinating.” Yes, Walters has been a cog in a coarsening culture. Some of her past picks for “The Most Fascinating List” included Paris Hilton, KimYe (Kim Kardashian and Kanye West) and twerker Miley Cyrus.

All Walters’ interviews make the flesh crawl. Paris Hilton made a porn debut, in which she made love to the camera (i.e. herself). Walters’ syrupy “journalism” transformed the narcissistic specter into a PG-rated tale of innocence betrayed. Well, of course: Paris was led astray by a man.

And the broadcaster’s empathic posturing concealed a good deal of cattiness, even cruelty. Her idea of getting to the guts of a story: Bring a supremely vulnerable celebrity to tears. Wicked Walters once prefaced an interview with singer Celine Dion by pronouncing, “You are not beautiful.” She then paused to watch, gleefully, as tears welled in Dion’s beautiful eyes. Now that’s what I call a scoop!

The one person to rival Barbara’s bitchiness is sly Katie Couric. She interviewed Hillary Clinton while drunk with love for Obama. Couric’s below-the-belt barbs made Hillary appear elevated by comparison. The former “first housewife” was courteous where Katie was unkind. “Someone told me your nickname in school was Miss Frigidaire. Is that true?” Couric inquired. “Only with some boys,” Clinton replied, laughing. Couric makes Clinton seem quick and classy.

Years back, Walters was granted an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin. To Walters, complexity has always been a cuss word. Her approach was to stick to the inane and the mundane, while lobbing an occasional misguided missile. Out of the blue – and true to her sensation-driven style – Walters asked the former KGB operative if he’d ever killed anyone. Putin’s mouth said no; his eyes seemed to be saying, “I feel a strong urge rising.”

Contrast the typical Walters tête-à-tête with the fusillade of irreverent questions and scalding ripostes Fallaci fired on Muammar Gadhafi in 1979. As the New Yorker’s Margaret Talbot tells it, at one point, the colonel complains that she must not have read his manifesto, “The Green Book.” “Her answer is pure Fallaci, and very satisfying: ‘On the contrary, I read it. It doesn’t take very long, you know, 15 minutes at the most. It’s so small. My powder compact is bigger than your little ‘Green Book.’”

Good newsmen are a dying breed. Good newswomen are mostly dead already. (For reasons not mysterious, mainstream mediocrities are doing their utmost to marginalize sleuths like Sharyl Attkisson, formerly of CBS, and Laura Poitras, the documentarian who helped Edward Snowden expose the National Security Agency.) By the time she died, the brilliant and brave Oriana Fallaci had long since been buried professionally by the likes of Barbara Walters. For her unabashed contempt of Islam, Fallaci was forced to flee her native Italy. She came to America, where, needless to say, she never made it onto Barbara’s List.

© 2014 by Ilana Mercer

[followbutton username=’IlanaMercer’ count=’true’ lang=’en’ theme=’light’]

Like Ilana Mercer’s Facebook page